Subsymbolic Approaches to Musical Composition. A Behavioral ModelSkip other details (including permanent urls, DOI, citation information)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. Please contact email@example.com to use this work in a way not covered by the license. :
For more information, read Michigan Publishing's access and usage policy.
Page 280 ï~~Subsymbolic approaches t behaviour Peter B Abstract The present paper suggests behaviour in a coi logical inference in a knowledge based system f explores Musical spontaneous composition pattern formation fron likened navigatior continuous, global interaction with the comp representations, relationships among abstract, I position in two dimensional space. Actors arc exchange of information when meeting in spa workspaces and results in behavioural compute the current model. We offer preliminary extensions. 1. Knowledge vs. behaviour. The symbolic approach has led impressi natural svstemn language systems, learning, diagnostics ar a~ndl knnwledoe hnsed internrethtinn N. I l..
Page 281 ï~~surface uniquely from microscopic specifications. open; there must be continuous exchange of informal must guaranteed internal feedback. Prigogin( temporal constructs that assemble and disassemble on they require energy to sustain them (Prigogine &Stc organization and relevance for Al, we refer to (St computational models for self -organization such as one described (Beyls, 89), and more recently, the uSt Belousov-Zh abotin sky reaction th rough direct com musi (Beyls, 90). The present approach model moving in two- dimensional space, uniquely characteri they interact when they meet space. The compo; screen" Composition becomes navigation in a hypot implementz inventor and explorer. Results from early (Beyls 86). Behaviour may be thought of as an alternati explores analogical representations of the world. In con' declarations, analogical representations keep part h representation. For instance, physical objects are repre take in the real world. A dynamical system is then use logical inference mechanism is no longer present. from the distributed behaviour of a large number of detailed dfesign.sheme fnr hinnina, musinal cnnstructs I
Page 282 ï~~7 global control value available to the system s navigator Sir required keep the system up and running. We thL global system parameter. In the examples given temperati C........... S * b C.... F a * *. N. -.... *U*4 %i: **4/.13 *. S. it,.. Is. *... ***** -a I I..... *0S a. 'Air-V.,,. bait. 'a-u A.Jv1 V.. - -
Page 283 ï~~behavioural model was written in Mach-2, a fast multitz graphic hardware control ST4 enhanced with additional display. With less than 8 actors, real time performance re 3b 3c 1%% L aIs na tin UIj I.a UI~J&f=jjjJ e,11!1!1!1!.1. 3d 9 3. Conclusion & acknowledgements.