Babyloniaca, études de philologie assyro-babylonienne.

ll8

G. B. DRIVER

Obv. (1) ga-ru-um Bu-ru-us-ha-tim (2) za-hi-ir GAL di-nam
(3) i-di-in-ma a zi-ir (4) lu-kui-tim sa 50 MA-NA KU-BABBAR(im)
(5) En-nam-A-sur a-na Ku-zi-a (6) i-di-nu-ma Zu-e-a (7, ga-ta-du-ni
su-ma (8) me-ma ga-tam lu KU-BABBAR (9) lu GIJSKIN lu AN-NA
(40) lu TUG-ZUN Zu-e-a
Bo. (11) a-na Ku-zi-a
Rev. (12) i-di-in (13) a-na Zu-e-a (14) lu-ku-tam Ku-zi-a ('15) lta-ar (19) me-ih-ra-at dub-bi-im (17) ha-ar-me-irm (18i sa di-in
ga-ri-im
'The higher (and) lower court of Burushadum has given judgement indeed in respect to the wares of (the value of) 50 rnanehs
of silver (which)4lnnam-Asur has given to Kuziatand for which)
Zuea has taken over the liability (?): if Zuea has given to Kuzia
any sum, whether silver or gold or lead or clothes, Kuzia shall
restore the wares to Zuea.
1' Copy of the sworn tablet of the judgement of the court.
LI. 4-6. That sa is the sign of the gen. case is shown by the
phon. compl. in KU-BABBAR(imn). If the rendering ' for which
E. gave 50 manehs of silver to K '. (Lewy) is adopted, there is
nothing to govern this genitive and nothing to express ' for' It
is therefore preferable to take sid as in the translation (Landsberger) and to assume that sda which' has been accidentaly omitted by the scribe at the beginning of 1. 5.
L. 6.Landsbereer's translation of idznu as schuldet is inexplicable.
L. 7. Cp. B I, 13 a 4 for ga-ta-du-ni. Lewy's proposal to read
iq-ta-du-ni cp. Ungnad, B. B., 129, 22), which he translates
unterdrifckt (?) hat (I ii from gadadu?) hardly makes sense. Landsberger translates 11. 6-7: 'wobei Z. die Haf't/ung mit iPbernonmmen
hat, which yields an excellent sense, but hie does not explain how
he gets this meaning.
70
T. C. LXI, 95; A. O. 7307.
[Cp. Landsberger, A. H., p. 18].
Obv. (1) i-nu-me A-sir-i-me-ti 2) a-na I-ku-nim DUMU SU-belim (3j A-mur-(D.)BABBAR DUMU Me-su-gal (4) -SUNINNI DUMU