Babyloniaca, études de philologie assyro-babylonienne.

BABYLONIAN BOOKS OF PRIVATE DEVOTION 27 Philological Note. The question which has interested scholars in regard to this series has been purely philological. Evidently E NU-R U is Sumerian, since it is used in at least three pure Sumerian texts. The tempting pronunciation nu-ru which is the Semitic word for light has been accepted until BREMMER with the counsels of SCHEIL objected to a Semitic phonetic rendering of a pure Sumerian word. BRTMMER however read nu-sub " the not incanted I,, but it is improbable that such a name would be given to a place where a service was held. We must seek, of course, for a ritualistic act here. SCHEIL and HOMMEL have pointed out that beside a bit NU-RU there exists also a MA NU-RI called the," boat of Sin,, K 4378 V 36. We know, too, that the Suinerians often used the names of sacred boats, carts and other objects in names of persons, thus ginar-ta-paddan " named by the sacred cart n,, ur-sugallam "( slave of the chapel,, etc., and so in a tablet published by SCHEIL in OLZ 1905 Sp. 351 a Semite (?) is called amel-elip-nu-ur-ru. We may be sure then that this ", man of the nurru boat,,, contains the name of the sacred ship of Sin in K 4378, there given nu-ri. nu-ri, nu-ur-ru and nu-ru are therefore all the same Sumerian word. Moreover we have seen that the symbolic act in the bit nuri ritual was probably fire, so that this would be additional evidence for regarding all these words as the Semitic nuiru. The problem seems at first perplexing but becomes more clear if we begin at the proper point. The Sumerian word for light was sir, sir, sir, se-ir1. It is further known that the sign NU is a variant of air in the name of the temple gig-sir-gdl; we have seen also that NU is a variant of zir in one of the amulets and, for further proof, see MEISSNER'S Seltene Assyrische Ideogramme n~ 1147 where NU-mag goes over into Semitic as zirma.^tu. So then in one of these incantations we find NU = sir actually used in the sense of light and the further inference is that NU-RU is to be read sir-ru = nu-ru in Semitic. Now we know also that ge-ir is a variant of nir in the words 1. BRtNNOW, Classified List 1650, 7530, 7467 and for zir 1664 see above p. 11.

/ 366
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Page 27 Image - Page 27 Plain Text - Page 27

About this Item

Title
Babyloniaca, études de philologie assyro-babylonienne.
Canvas
Page 27
Publication
Paris,: P. Guethner.
Subject terms
Akkadian language -- Periodicals.

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1616.0003.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/g/genpub/acg1616.0003.001/35

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/genpub:acg1616.0003.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Babyloniaca, études de philologie assyro-babylonienne." In the digital collection Digital General Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acg1616.0003.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.