North American species of Mycena.

6 NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF MYCENA pophores and line drawings of the microscopic characters made it our most completely illustrated contribution on Mycena up to that time. Many lists, of course, have been published for various parts of North America. That of Harkness and Moore (1881) was the first to record a substantial number from the Pacific Coast. Most lists contain M. galericulata, M. corticola, M. Leaiana, and M. haematopus. It has been impossible to verify the published reports of all species by an examination of the specimens. Without any question many are erroneous. Most reports of M. galericulata probably are based on M. inclinata. M. corticola, M. haematopus, and M. Leaiana are the three species most likely to be identified correctly. However, the report of M. corticola by Harkness and Moore needs further confirmation. I have searched in vain for this species along the Pacific coast, but found only M. madronicola, a fungus very similar in appearance. It is likely that most early American records of M. amicta or M. Iris for the eastern United States are based on M. subcaerulea. SUMMARY In the following account 218 species are recognized from the United States and Canada and 19 from the American tropics. Those from the United States and Canada are distributed in the subgenera as follows: Pseudomycena, 6; Eumycena, 185; Glutinipes, 21; Mycenella, 6. In Eumycena the distribution in sections is: Cyanescentes, 2; Corticolae, 5; Deminutivae, 37; Lactipedes, 11; Adonidae, 27; Calodontes, 18; Typicae, 66; Omphaliariae, 14; Floccipedes, 3; Corticatae, 3; Hydropus, 5. Naturally the Typicae of Eumycena form a center about which to group the other sections and subgenera. Kiihner in his monograph recognized 143 species in Mycena for Europe. This figure should be compared with the 218 known to occur in the United States and Canada. Even after one allows for the usual differences of opinion among investigators as to what constitutes a species, it is still evident that North America contains a much more diverse Mycena flora than Europe. This is in line with observations on other genera such as Leucopaxillus (see Singer and Smith, 1943), and also with mine on Cortinarius. Studies of the Mycena flora of other parts of the world have not been extensive enough to justify comparison. Cleland (1934) recognized 17 species from South Australia, but that flora must still be regarded as relatively unexplored as compared with those of Europe and North America. The small number recorded from South America, Asia,

/ 740
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Page 6 Image - Page 6 Plain Text - Page 6

About this Item

Title
North American species of Mycena.
Author
Smith, Alexander Hanchett, 1904-
Canvas
Page 6
Publication
Ann Arbor,: Univ. of Michigan Press
[1947]
Subject terms
Mycenae (Extinct city)

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agk0806.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fung1tc/agk0806.0001.001/24

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Some materials may be protected by copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Herbarium professional staff at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact [email protected].

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/fung1tc:agk0806.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"North American species of Mycena." In the digital collection University of Michigan Herbarium Fungus Monographs. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agk0806.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.