The boletes of Michigan, by Alexander H. Smith and Harry D. Thiers.

INTRODUCTION 15 such as New England, when that flora is studied on the basis of hyphal characters. However, it is possible that in all areas cut over at the time the virgin timber was harvested, then burned over repeatedly, and that finally "came back" with a cover of such weed trees as aspen and birch that these areas (as far as Leccinum is concerned) furnished an invasion site offering many variants a chance to survive that they would not have had under other circumstances. These variants undoubtedly came from areas in which aspen and birch had escaped the devastation of American-type logging and subsequent treatment of the land, such as swamps and stream borders, and which in a few years produced enough spores to invade the burned-over sites as these were reoccupied by trees. But few fungi are homozygous; this means that the invaders were for the most part all slightly different genetically. These mycelia became established and are still producing basidiocarps, and since they are not all genetically alike, the basidiocarps present differences confusing to the taxonomist. We have located certain mycelia and find that each year the basidiocarps from them are constant in the characters we are using to distinguish them, but before we can recognize these variants as species we must demonstrate that there is a population of mycelia all of which produces similar basidiocarps, and there should be evidence from collections studied that this population occupies a considerable area. This may take years to accomplish and is the reason we make no claim that this publication is "complete" for the genus in the state. Obviously, new variants are arising continuously, and species from other areas always possess the potential of migrating into the state, especially if a temporary weather cycle of 5 to 10-year duration favors this process. Since on occasion mushroom books are published, or republished, and their publishers make the claim that theirs is the only complete one, it is worth mentioning that there is no complete technical monograph for any group of higher fungi in North America, and one is not likely for a long time, and none of the popular mushroom books was designed to be "complete." GENERAL COMMENTS ON DISTRIBUTION If the boletes of the state are reviewed from the standpoint of their occurrence in other areas, as one would expect, most are New England species described by Peck and by Frost. Suillus is a typical example (see S. acidus, S. americanus, S. subaureus, S. subluteus, S. unicolor, S. brevipes, etc.). European species in the aggregate are in the

/ 610
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Page 15 Image - Page 15 Plain Text - Page 15

About this Item

Title
The boletes of Michigan, by Alexander H. Smith and Harry D. Thiers.
Author
Smith, Alexander Hanchett, 1904-
Canvas
Page 15
Publication
Ann Arbor,: University of Michigan Press
[1971]
Subject terms
Boletaceae -- Identification. -- Michigan
Mushrooms -- Identification. -- Michigan

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agk0838.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fung1tc/agk0838.0001.001/23

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Some materials may be protected by copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Herbarium professional staff at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact [email protected].

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/fung1tc:agk0838.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The boletes of Michigan, by Alexander H. Smith and Harry D. Thiers." In the digital collection University of Michigan Herbarium Fungus Monographs. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agk0838.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 30, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.