Au Sable River assessment: Troy G. Zorn and Steven P. Sendek.
Annotations Tools
Au Sable River Assessment reaches of all these tributaries and the mainstem down to the mouth of the South Branch Au Sable River. Fish species richness at these sites was lower than at warmer upstream reaches (which would be expected given the cooler temperatures), typically ranging between 7-9 species (Richards 1976). In 1972, the most coummon fishes in these reaches included: brook trout, brown trout, mottled sculpin, slimy sculpin, common shiner, blacknose dace, creek chub, white sucker, and johnny darter. Increased brown trout, slimy sculpin, and round whitefish (all coldwater species) suggested that these reaches had gotten colder between the 1920s and 1972. Decreased temperatures may have resulted from removal of old logging dams or increased shading due to forest regrowth (Richards 1976). Less frequent presence of blacknose shiners, common shiners, pearl dace, and river chubs in the 1972 collections might also reflect decreased temperatures, or an increase in sand and silt in these reaches since the 1920s. Comprehensive surveys would aid in describing how these reaches have changed since 1972. Self-sustaining populations of brook trout and brown trout have existed in upper mainstem, North Branch, and South Branch Au Sable rivers since these waters were stocked in the late 1800s. Population estimates of brown and brook trout in several reaches of these waters have been made by the MDNR, Fisheries Division nearly every year since 1957 (Figures 23 and 24). These data demonstrate the variability of trout populations over time, with variations being attributable to many possible causes including habitat and water quality changes, hydrologic and climatic changes, and changes in angling pressure, regulations, and methods. Explanation of these trends has been complicated by simultaneous changes in several factors, and a lack of past data for testing the influence of suspected causes. However, analyses of these data have contributed greatly to our knowledge of trout biology and population ecology, and provided much of the scientific basis for trout research and management in Michigan and the United States (Table 18). Richards (1976) grouped downstream collection sites into "large river" and "below impoundment" habitat categories. We will briefly discuss changes that occurred among these habitats between the 1920s and 1972 before continuing our description of their present fish communities. The "large river" habitat category included 6 stations on the mainstem between the mouth of the South Branch Au Sable River and Lake Huron. Richard (1976) noted substantial species shifts in this habitat type. Declines of rainbow trout and slimy sculpin, both coldwater species, and of river chub and longnose dace, fishes intolerant of the silt and turbidity, suggested a change in water quality. Greatest species shifts were observed among the 4 "below impoundment" stations on the mainstem from Mio downstream. Longnose dace, blackchin shiner, river chub, rosyface shiner, and redfin shiner, fishes intolerant of silty and turbid conditions (Trautman 1981), were absent from the 1972 collections. The mimic shiner, a species relatively tolerant of silt and turbidity, was absent from these four stations in the 1920s but abundant at all of them in 1972. Richards (1976) attributed the general decline in fish populations here to hydroelectric peaking operations and the influence of these aging impoundments on downstream water quality. From Wakeley Bridge to the upper end of Mio Pond, the river grows considerably in size as it receives waters from the North Branch and South Branch Au Sable rivers, and Big Creek-South. Though summer stream temperatures in rivers typically warm downstream, temperatures decline along this river mainstem valley segment due to groundwater accrual from adjacent ice contact deposits and tributaries draining them (Farrand and Bell 1982). Lowest stream temperatures were at the downstream end of this segment at Parmalee Bridge, just above Mio Pond (Coopes et al. 1974). Three collections were made in this mainstem valley segment in 1972 (Coopes et al. 1974). The number of fish species per site ranged from 7-14, and averaged 11. Most commonly collected fishes were brook trout, brown trout, mottled sculpin, slimy sculpin, common shiner, blacknose dace, creek chub, and white sucker. Sampling by SWQD in 1992 at Parmalee Bridge (Morse 1994), revealed a "good" fish community having 14 species, the most common ones being brook trout, creek chub, 48
-
Scan #1
Page #1 - Title Page
-
Scan #2
Page i
-
Scan #3
Page ii
-
Scan #4
Page iii - Table of Contents
-
Scan #5
Page iv - Table of Contents
-
Scan #6
Page v - Table of Contents
-
Scan #7
Page vi
-
Scan #8
Page vii - List of Tables
-
Scan #9
Page viii - List of Tables
-
Scan #10
Page ix - List of Illustrations
-
Scan #11
Page x - List of Illustrations
-
Scan #12
Page xi
-
Scan #13
Page xii
-
Scan #14
Page xiii
-
Scan #15
Page xiv
-
Scan #16
Page xv
-
Scan #17
Page xvi
-
Scan #18
Page xvii
-
Scan #19
Page xviii
-
Scan #20
Page 1
-
Scan #21
Page 2
-
Scan #22
Page 3
-
Scan #23
Page 4
-
Scan #24
Page 5
-
Scan #25
Page 6
-
Scan #26
Page 7
-
Scan #27
Page 8
-
Scan #28
Page 9
-
Scan #29
Page 10
-
Scan #30
Page 11
-
Scan #31
Page 12
-
Scan #32
Page 13
-
Scan #33
Page 14
-
Scan #34
Page 15
-
Scan #35
Page 16
-
Scan #36
Page 17
-
Scan #37
Page 18
-
Scan #38
Page 19
-
Scan #39
Page 20
-
Scan #40
Page 21
-
Scan #41
Page 22
-
Scan #42
Page 23
-
Scan #43
Page 24
-
Scan #44
Page 25
-
Scan #45
Page 26
-
Scan #46
Page 27
-
Scan #47
Page 28
-
Scan #48
Page 29
-
Scan #49
Page 30
-
Scan #50
Page 31
-
Scan #51
Page 32
-
Scan #52
Page 33
-
Scan #53
Page 34
-
Scan #54
Page 35
-
Scan #55
Page 36
-
Scan #56
Page 37
-
Scan #57
Page 38
-
Scan #58
Page 39
-
Scan #59
Page 40
-
Scan #60
Page 41
-
Scan #61
Page 42
-
Scan #62
Page 43
-
Scan #63
Page 44
-
Scan #64
Page 45
-
Scan #65
Page 46
-
Scan #66
Page 47
-
Scan #67
Page 48
-
Scan #68
Page 49
-
Scan #69
Page 50
-
Scan #70
Page 51
-
Scan #71
Page 52
-
Scan #72
Page 53
-
Scan #73
Page 54
-
Scan #74
Page 55
-
Scan #75
Page 56
-
Scan #76
Page 57
-
Scan #77
Page 58
-
Scan #78
Page 59
-
Scan #79
Page 60
-
Scan #80
Page 61
-
Scan #81
Page 62
-
Scan #82
Page 63
-
Scan #83
Page 64
-
Scan #84
Page 65
-
Scan #85
Page 66
-
Scan #86
Page 67
-
Scan #87
Page 68
-
Scan #88
Page 69
-
Scan #89
Page 70
-
Scan #90
Page 71
-
Scan #91
Page 72
-
Scan #92
Page 73
-
Scan #93
Page 74
-
Scan #94
Page 75
-
Scan #95
Page 76
-
Scan #96
Page 77
-
Scan #97
Page 78
-
Scan #98
Page 79
-
Scan #99
Page 80
-
Scan #100
Page 81
-
Scan #101
Page 82
-
Scan #102
Page 83
-
Scan #103
Page 84
-
Scan #104
Page 85
-
Scan #105
Page 86
-
Scan #106
Page 87
-
Scan #107
Page 88
-
Scan #108
Page 89
-
Scan #109
Page 90
-
Scan #110
Page 91
-
Scan #111
Page 92
-
Scan #112
Page 93
-
Scan #113
Page 94
-
Scan #114
Page 95
-
Scan #115
Page 96
-
Scan #116
Page 97
-
Scan #117
Page 98
-
Scan #118
Page 99
-
Scan #119
Page 100
-
Scan #120
Page 101
-
Scan #121
Page 102
-
Scan #122
Page 103
-
Scan #123
Page 104
-
Scan #124
Page 105
-
Scan #125
Page 106
-
Scan #126
Page 107
-
Scan #127
Page 108
-
Scan #128
Page 109
-
Scan #129
Page 110
-
Scan #130
Page 111
-
Scan #131
Page 112
-
Scan #132
Page 113
-
Scan #133
Page 114
-
Scan #134
Page 115
-
Scan #135
Page 116
-
Scan #136
Page 117
-
Scan #137
Page 118
-
Scan #138
Page 119
-
Scan #139
Page 120
-
Scan #140
Page 121
-
Scan #141
Page 122
-
Scan #142
Page 123
-
Scan #143
Page 124
-
Scan #144
Page 125
-
Scan #145
Page 126
-
Scan #146
Page 127
-
Scan #147
Page 128
-
Scan #148
Page 129
-
Scan #149
Page 130
-
Scan #150
Page 131
-
Scan #151
Page 132
-
Scan #152
Page 133
-
Scan #153
Page 134
-
Scan #154
Page 135
-
Scan #155
Page 136
-
Scan #156
Page 137
-
Scan #157
Page 138
-
Scan #158
Page 139
-
Scan #159
Page 140
-
Scan #160
Page 141
-
Scan #161
Page 142
-
Scan #162
Page 143
-
Scan #163
Page 144
-
Scan #164
Page 145
-
Scan #165
Page 146
-
Scan #166
Page 147
-
Scan #167
Page 148
-
Scan #168
Page 149
-
Scan #169
Page 150
-
Scan #170
Page 151
-
Scan #171
Page 152
-
Scan #172
Page 153
-
Scan #173
Page 154
-
Scan #174
Page 155
-
Scan #175
Page 156
-
Scan #176
Page 157
-
Scan #177
Page 158
-
Scan #178
Page 159
-
Scan #179
Page 160
-
Scan #180
Page 161
-
Scan #181
Page 162
-
Scan #182
Page 163
-
Scan #183
Page 164
-
Scan #184
Page 165
-
Scan #185
Page 166
-
Scan #186
Page 167
-
Scan #187
Page 168
-
Scan #188
Page 169
-
Scan #189
Page 170
-
Scan #190
Page 171
-
Scan #191
Page 172
-
Scan #192
Page 173
-
Scan #193
Page 174
-
Scan #194
Page 175
-
Scan #195
Page 176
-
Scan #196
Page 177
-
Scan #197
Page 178
-
Scan #198
Page 179
-
Scan #199
Page 180
-
Scan #200
Page 181
-
Scan #201
Page 182
-
Scan #202
Page 183
-
Scan #203
Page 184
-
Scan #204
Page 185
-
Scan #205
Page 186
-
Scan #206
Page 187
-
Scan #207
Page 188
-
Scan #208
Page 189
-
Scan #209
Page 190
-
Scan #210
Page 191
-
Scan #211
Page 192
-
Scan #212
Page 193
-
Scan #213
Page 194
-
Scan #214
Page 195
-
Scan #215
Page 196
-
Scan #216
Page 197
-
Scan #217
Page 198
-
Scan #218
Page 199
-
Scan #219
Page 200
-
Scan #220
Page 201
-
Scan #221
Page 202
-
Scan #222
Page 203
-
Scan #223
Page 204
-
Scan #224
Page 205
-
Scan #225
Page 206
-
Scan #226
Page 207
-
Scan #227
Page 208
-
Scan #228
Page 209
-
Scan #229
Page 210
-
Scan #230
Page 211
-
Scan #231
Page 212
-
Scan #232
Page 213
-
Scan #233
Page 214
-
Scan #234
Page 215
-
Scan #235
Page 216
-
Scan #236
Page 217
-
Scan #237
Page 218
-
Scan #238
Page 219
-
Scan #239
Page 220
-
Scan #240
Page 221
-
Scan #241
Page 222
-
Scan #242
Page 223
-
Scan #243
Page 224
-
Scan #244
Page 225
-
Scan #245
Page 226
-
Scan #246
Page 227
-
Scan #247
Page 228
-
Scan #248
Page 229
-
Scan #249
Page 230
-
Scan #250
Page 231
-
Scan #251
Page 232
-
Scan #252
Page 233
-
Scan #253
Page 234
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Au Sable River assessment: Troy G. Zorn and Steven P. Sendek.
- Author
- Zorn, Troy G.
- Publication
- Ann Arbor :: Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division,
- 2001.
- Subject terms
- Water quality biological assessment -- Michigan
- Water quality -- Michigan
- Fish populations -- Michigan
- Au Sable River (Mich.)
Technical Details
- Collection
- Fisheries Division Library
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/4969012.0001.001
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fishery/4969012.0001.001/67
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. Some materials may be protected by copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Digitization made possible through The Bernice Benson Whalls Library Endowment Fund.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/fishery:4969012.0001.001
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Au Sable River assessment: Troy G. Zorn and Steven P. Sendek." In the digital collection Fisheries Division Library. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/4969012.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 10, 2025.