Doctor, which is this, Either we are just before the having that faith, or not; If before, then that faith or perswasion justifieth not, for it found us just; if not just, then by that full perswasion we believe an untruth. In∣stead of this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, some of our Divines bring in a recumbence or reliance upon Christ for Justification and Salvation, which is not exposed to the former Dilemma, and may stand for justifying Faith, if it may properly be called Faith at all; whereof there may be some doubt, as I conceive. But since this Faith supposeth perfection, why do we re∣ject that which the Schoolmen call fides for∣mata, and seemeth to be intended, Gal. 5.6. by faith working by love, or as it is in the Sy∣riack Version, Fides quoe per charitatem per∣ficitur, Faith compleated (or made perfect) by love? But that which is said Rom. 4.5. may be objected, viz. To him that worketh not, but believeth in him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness; which words seem to make works unnecessary asso∣ciates to Faith in justification; but I conceive that the working there spoken of, is meant of works meriting Salvation (or at least thought meritorious, as by nature we are all apt to think, and as the Romish Doctors hold some of theirs to be), for so much seemeth to be intended in the 4th. Verse immediately pre∣ceding this, where it is said, Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but