Page 533
The Communion of Saints.
EPHES. 4.16.From whom the whole body fitly joyn'd together, and compacted by that which every joynt supplies, according to the effectual working in the mea∣sure of every part maketh increase of the body, unto the edifying of itself in love.
VVHen I read that those who glory in the name of Saints, should yet cast an ill eye upon those words of the Creed, the communion of Saints; no little wonder and astonishment (such is I profess my dulness and ig∣norance) hath affected me; I cast about to know the cause of this dislike; what might be the crime of this clause? how it had offended? that it must now in the fagg end of the world come under the spunge! Especially since this is so consonant to these Scriptures, 1 Joh. 1.3. 1 Pet. 2.4, 5. Heb. 12.22, 23. Ephes. 2.19, 20. and besides others, this very place I have read unto you; out of all which places Interpreters with one voice have collected the Commu∣nion of Saints.
What then should be the cause this clause should be exploded, I could not conceive, till at last I remembred that Donatus was risen again, and with his breath had poisoned the multitude, who out of blind zeal and fancy they bore to particular and separate Congregations, that suppose the name of Saints could not agree to the Catholick Church, neither might any be of that Com∣munion, who were not admitted vvithin the vvalls of their Meeting-hou∣ses. To believe then a Catholick Church, and in it a Communion of Saints, who vvere not members of their Congregations, is in their judgement to believe a lye.
See vvhat self-love will do, not only make men high-minded, to think too vvell of themselves, but also to disdain and judge uncharitably of others, even to excommunicate them, and hold them no better than Heathens and Publicans, because they will not forfeit their wits, captivate their understand∣ings, sit down and break bread with them. Were this their severity to be ad∣mitted, what would become of all the Saints departed before they were born! what of greater number of Christians in the Eeastern and Western Churches? all which died in the bosome of the Catholick Church, and believed the Com∣munion of Saints, being utterly unacqainted with the necessity of collected Churches in their sense for the attaining of salvation.
Assured they were, that Christs body was but one, the parts whereof were knit together by those bonds our Apostle mentions in the former verses,* 1.1 and therefore doubted not to esteem these in the society of Saints who professed one Lord, one Faith, one Baptisme with them; whether sincerely, or fainedly, they left it to God to judge. Yet if among these they found any corrupt, scanda∣lous members, by the power of the keys, they cast them out as unfit for their communion.
The rest in charity they held to be of the body of the Church; And if it may not offend some uncharitable ears, Saints; and I conceive it an error to think otherwise: which mistake doth I know arise out of heat of zeal, but not well grounded as it ought to be upon knowledge; for were that distinction of Saints by calling, and Saints by a true faith and life, well heeded, the mistake would easily vanish, and the offence taken, not given, be removed.
This distinction is clear in the Scripture, the first part of it in St. Paul.