but unfortunate, being in most of his enter∣prises betrayed or defeated by the Traitor Edric. Who, being a man of a mean family, by his insinua∣tions got into power; of a crafty wit, fair spoken tongue; he exceeded all men living of th••se times in ma∣lice and treachery, in pride and cruelty. His brother Agelmer was the father of Wulnoth, the father of Earl Godwin.
[ 4] The fourth is Ethelstan Rex Anglorum. Reverse, Hegenredes moneta on Deorabi. Coined at Darby.
[ 5] The fifth is another face of King Ethelred. Re∣verse, Watlfreth moneta Gippeswic. Ipswich the place of coining it.
[ 6] The sixth is Eadmund. Reverse, B••in LYG. Who it was I know not.
[ 7] The seventh seems to be of Coenuulf King of the West-Saxons. Of whom see Tab. 6. c. 2. of the Northumbers. I know not where to begin to read the letters on the reverse; nor do I understand them.
[ 8] The eighth is Eadred Rex. The reverse, Manna moneta. This face resembles not that in Tab. 6. c. 30.
[ 9. 11. 12 37.] The ninth, eleventh, twelfth, and thirty seventh, seem to be of the ancient Irish Kings, the only ones that I ever saw. The letters are very unusual, and therefore difficult to be read or understood. The ninth I conjecture to be Dida Medino. The reverse, two hands in the opposite angles of a cross. The word seems to be Iniconeic, a name (as I am in∣formed) still extant in Ireland.
[ 10] The tenth, if it be not Offa, I know not who it is.
[ 11] The eleventh is of an Irish Prince (I conceive) by the words Midino on the ninth coin, Midini upon this and the twelfth, which seems to refer or belong to Midia, now called Meath, one of the divisions and countreys in Ireland.
[ 13] The thirteenth is Eadear Rex. Reverse, Aethered moneta Lundoniae. It was probably one of the Ed∣wards, but the effigies being like none of the other, I know not of whom it is.
[ 14] The fourteenth, Dmo, unless it be one of the Edmonds, I cannot guess at it; but the countenance, cloaths, &c. are not like any of the other. The re∣verse also is equally unknown.
[ 15] The fifteenth I do not understand.
[ 16] The sixteenth is Coenuulf a Mercian; but not like any of those already described. The reverse Ceol∣heard I understand not.
[ 17] The seventeenth is set down because of the beauty and unusualness of the reverse.
[ 18] The eighteenth. There were divers Aethelstans, one was the son either of Egbert or Aetheluulf, and was King of Kent; another was the son of Edward Sen. of whom before: the third was a Danish King cal∣led Gormund, who being overcome by Aelfred at the battle of Eddington, submitted himself and his army, either to embrace the Christian Religion or depart the whole Countrey. Himself with 30 of his chiefest Commanders were baptized, with a great part of the Army, the rest quitted the Realm. King Aelfred was his Godfather, call'd him Aethelstan, and gave him the Kingdom of the East-Angles then very much dispeopled by the cruel wars. I take this coin to be of him; and the rather, because the reverse seems to be Danish language, and not understood by me.
[ 19] The nineteenth is of Edmond; I should attribute it to the valiant Ironside, if I could find other of his coins; but his reign was short and troublesom.
[ 20] The twentieth is of S. Edward the Confessor; pub∣lished here, because by the reverse it should seem, what I have read also, that he either founded or re∣edified the great Church of St. Edmond at Bury.
[ 21] The twenty first is Aethelnoth on Snotenegham (No∣tingham) who is meant by it I know not; but it is worth nothing, since both sides are the same.
[ 22] The twenty second seems to be of the great Aethel∣stan, what [to Brit] means I know not. The reverse is Regnald moneta Eoferwic.
[ 23] The twenty third I believe was of Ethelstan King of Kent, a very valiant Prince, and fortunate against the Danes: he died young. The reverse is Berharhed¦on, no place named.
The twenty fourth is of King Edgar, of whom we [ 24] have spoken before. The reverse is Wermod moneta.
The twenty fifth Sci Canuti. This rare coin was [ 25] lent us by that ingenious and worthy Gentleman Mr. Ralph Thoresby; which he saith was sent him out of Swedeland; and found in a vault in Gothland up∣on St. Canutus's coffin; at the time when his church in Ottensea was repaired, anno 1582. The reverse in a cross IHC (Jesus) INRI (Jesus Nazarenus Rex Ju∣daeorum). A and D are conjectured to be Anglia and Dania: that King (as Saxo Grammaticus, Hist. lib. lxii. noteth) looking upon his pretensions to the Crown of England as just as any of his Predecessors, was resolved to attempt the regaining of it.
The twenty sixth I cannot interpret. [ 26]
The twenty seventh is also of Ethelstan, probably [ 27] King of Kent; because of his helmet made after an antique fashion, but useful; covering the nape of the neck; and a bar descending as low as his nose; he hath also a gorget: The reverse Smala, I take to be the name of the Mintmaster.
The twenty eighth is Wiglaf. After that Beor∣nuulf [ 28] was slain by the East-Angles, and Ludican by Egbert; This Wiglaf obtained (but I know not how) the Mercian Kingdom. But he being also overcome by Egbert, resigned, and Egbert restored it to him under such a tribute; and so he reigned 13 years. Little recorded of him. Redward was Mintmaster.
The twenty ninth is Sihtric Rex DHGH. What [ 29] these letters signifie, is unknown to me, He was a Danish King in Northumberland, for his pride and tyranny very much hated of his neighbours. To strengthen himself, he desired to marry Edith the sister of the great Aethelstan; who would not consent till he promised to become Christian, as he did, and was baptized, but died not long after. His two sons, because they would not turn Christians, fled their countrey; Gudferth went into Scotland, and Anlaf into Ireland; where they wrought all the mischief they could against the English; till Aethelstan utterly vanquished them both. V. Tab. 6. c. 9. The re∣verse is Colbrand. Why may not this be that Colbrand, in the Romance of Guy of Warwick, mentioned (by Knighton and others) to have combated, and been vanquished by that famous Earl? whose valour de∣served better than to have been discredited by those fabulous, if not ridiculous, exaggerations. How∣ever it appears by this coin, that those persons were contemporaries in the time of King Aethelstan, and of a Danish King (whom the fable miscalls) enemy for a long time to Aethelstan. The two combatants also seem to have been very eminent for their valour and employments. Upon these true considerations, (according to the custom of the times about the holy war) some ill-employed persons raised up the sorry childish fabrick of a silly fable.
The thirtieth is of Aethelstan; to brie I understand [ 30] not: the reverse Pauls moneta Leiec. seems to be coined at Leicester.
The thirty first I read Eadred Rex, the reverse, [ 31] Garuurd moneta.
The thirty second Eadward Rex; the reverse, [ 32] Uulfgar under the front of a church, probably West∣minster-Abby.
The thirty third is Berthulf Rex, of the Mercians; [ 33] of whom we have mentioned before: the reverse is Byrnuuald.
The thirty fourth is Anlaf Rex to do, the meaning [ 34] unknown; the reverse is Radulf, under such a plant as is also in a coin of St. Edward's.
The thirty fifth is a very old face, if of any I sup∣pose [ 35] it must be of St. Edward; the reverse is Thorr on Eoferwic.
The thirty sixth St. Neglin. I have already de∣clared [ 36] that I knew not who he was.
The thirty seventh seems to be of an Irish Prince, [ 37] to me unlegible.
The thirty eighth is Edwin Rex. This seems to [ 38] have been the glorious King of the Northumbers; who being forced out of his countrey by a cruel and tyrannical Usurper, betook himself to Redwald King of the East-Angles; who also after many pro∣mises and threats, agreed to deliver him up to his