Page 134
VERSE 6. Hee that regardeth a day, regardeth it vnto the Lord; and hee that regardeth not the day to the Lord, he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giueth God thanks: and he that eateth not, to the Lord hee eateth not, and giueth God thanks.
IN these words beginnes the Direction, how they should carry themselues each to other.
To omit many coacted expositions: M. Caluin takes these words as a precept, or exhortation rather then an affirmati∣on; and to this Pareus seemes also to encline: but the reason alledged of Thanks, noteth a thing done, not a precept of a thing to be done.
Here therefore I take it the direction verse 3. and repea∣ted verse 30. is to be vnderstood: and here a reason thereof brought from the end, which both the strong and weake pro∣pound to themselues in their different courses, which is the glory of God, and the pleasing of him: which reason, both the instances being here brought, may be thus formed:
Hee that doth that which he doth, to the Lord, is not of his brother to be despised or iudged:
But he that eateth, or eateth not, obserueth a day, or ob∣serueth not, doth it to the Lord:
Therefore, &c.
To doe a thing, or not to doe a thing to the Lord; is so to doe, or not, to the honour of God: or because you are perswa∣ded, that such doing, or not doing pleaseth God, or at least displeaseth him not.
The strong put no difference in meats or dayes, because hee knew that God would no longer be worshipped by such or∣dinances, and that his Christian liberty was not displeasing to God.
The weake made difference, because he thought his consci∣ence was still bound by the Law, and that such obseruations pleased God.
The weake erred; not of malice, but of ignorance and in∣firmity: