VERSE. 3. — For God hath receiued him.
IN these words, and in the next verse, are two reasons to perswade to the direction.
There is some question to which part this reason should serue; and who should be meant by him.
Him: that is, the weake one, say some: others by him vn∣derstand the strong Christian.
Some make this argument to bee on the behalfe of the weake, and the other of the strong: some affirme contrarily: and some that both the reasons belong to both.
Doubtlesse both the reasons are brought to the same thing, and rather in the behalfe of the strong Christian, who is the Gentile, against the Iew, then otherwise.
1 For first, it is most naturall and orderly, that him should be preferred to the next before spoken of: Let not him which eateth not, iudge him which eates, for God hath receiued him.
2 The word receiued properly belongs to the Gentiles, as it is an attribute to God; for the Iewes were receiued be∣fore, and thought more contemptuously of the Gentiles, and highly of themselues.
3 In the next verse, Who art thou that iudgest? to iudge was the fault of the weake Christian.
Doth Paul then let the strong alone? No: but first he dea∣leth against the weake, because he is most guilty. They both sinned in practice; but the weake in opinion also, mantaining an intolerable error; and they tooke offence at that which the strong lawfully might doe, and therefore were the cause of all the broyles.
Afterwards he deales against them both, verse 10. and principally against the strong, verse 13. and so to the end of the Chapter.
The weake then may not iudge the strong for eating: The reason is taken from the dignity of the strong: God hath re∣ceiued