In this sentence are two parts to be considered: the Sub∣iect, and the Predicate.
The subiect in these words, Hee that condemneth not him∣selfe in that thing which he alloweth.
The predicate, is happy.
In the subiect, the person capable of this happinesse is de∣scribed by the effect denyed, condemneth not himselfe. Where we haue the action, condemneth; the obiect personall, him∣selfe. Both these amplified from the generality, He, this in∣definite being equipollent to a generall: and from the obiect reall, the thing about which he condemneth not himselfe, in that thing which he alloweth.
Hee that condemneth not himselfe. For the variety of the sig∣nification of the Greek word which signifies to iudge as well as to condemne, this Aphorisme is diuersly applyed.
Some say that Paul here strikes the weake,
telling him that he is blessed and happy, if he cease iudging of others, yea, if he iudge not himselfe to be iustified or more righteous for his abstinence.
Others,
Happy is he which makes not a conscience to himselfe, and bindes not himselfe when God bindes him not.
Others still applying it to the weak,
that he is happy which takes not vpon him to determine of things on his owne head, that trusts not to his owne iudgement, but aduiseth himselfe by them which haue more knowledge in the Scriptures, Fa∣thers, and stories of the Church.
But with Mr. Caluin, Aretius, and other many, I referre it to the strong, not onely in the particular of meates, but of all indifferent things, lawfull in themselues, but vnlawfull in the case of scandall.
In that which he alloweth. The word signifieth allowance vpon due examination and tryall, and so implyes allowance vpon sound iudgement and vnerring.
Hee that knoweth the lawfulnesse of things indifferent, and doth not so vse them (namely giuing offence to the weake) that his conscience checke him for it, is happy.
Happy. Wee may take it largely for the aggregation of all profitable things: for certainly he is in a most blessed estate,