of men, of mindes, of manners, able to effeminate euen a Romane Spirit, euen masculine Vertue it selfe: as not onely Plato, Cato, and some of the wisest Heathens, but that once Light of Oxford, and other zealous men of our owne, besides the Fathers, haue thought and written. Thus, I know, it may be abused; so may the best blessings of God, women to vncleannesse, wine to drunkennesse, as indeed they both are by the Ers and Onans, and the Baltazars of our dayes: licencious men, whose belly is their god, and whose goddesse is Venus; so may meate to gluttony, yron to wounds, or vnlawfull blood-shed: Tobaccho from a Physicall vse, to a vaine phantasticke, hume∣rous abusiue profuse prodigalitie: Apparell to pride and luxurie: Wit to Ma∣chiuillian policie: Authoritie (as Ahabs) to crueltie: Magistracie to Iniustice and briberie: the Artes and tongues, sophistically to colour Schisme and He∣resie: so all the rest of Gods creatures, blessings, graces, to superfluity, pride, arrogancie, vanitie, villanie, and the most egregious iniquitie.
Euen so I say of Poetrie, because many vaine vicious men abuse it; some, euen of the sonnes of Belial, doe prostitute it as a Baude to sensualitie: may it not therefore be moderately vsed (as a man lawfully his marriage) for the forming and framing the diuiner issues of his soule, and the mentall concep∣tions of his vnderstanding? Yea indeed, the more that the world abuseth this, the more are they to be applauded and approued, that seeke to refine it, and bring it to the true vse: like as Erasmus, Melancthon, Agricola and others, de∣serue well of all posteritie, for refining the Latine tongue in Belgia, long be∣fore rusted, and barbarously corrupted by the inundation of the Gothes and Vandals.
I know not what more can iustly be obiected against me: vnlesse, first, the grauitie of my place and function, in intermedling: or secondly, my defects in handling: or thirdly, my enlarging and adding more in the Poeme, then is in the Prose, Greeke or Latine. For the first, if any aske or maruell, as once, why Saul amongst the Prophets? so now, why a Preacher amongst the rancke of Poets? To stoppe the mouth of this exception, I might answere, that one Swallow makes no Summer, nor one action a habite, to giue a denomination to the doer, no more then to play one straine of a Lute, make a professed Mu∣sitian. Secondly, if to Poetize were a disparagement, then the grauest Di∣uines that euer the world had, are culpable. For to omit the Poems of Moses and Dauid Prophets, of Salomon a Preacher, before specified; haue wee not the Poems of many of the Fathers? Are not the Poems of Prudentius, Pau∣linus, Fortunatus, and diuers others extant? yea haue we not of later times the Poems of Melancton, Luther, Beza, Strigelius and diuers others? Yea what part of Scripture is there, but I can instance famous schollers and iudicious Di∣uines, to haue written vpon them Glosses, Comments, Expositions, Paraphra∣ses, &c. all in Poetrie, both Protestants, and the acutest of the Papists? yea, some versifying vpon all in generall; in which it were easie to instance not only the Authors, but the place and time of their publishing and printing, with the quantitie of their volumes. To insist in some, haue we not extant Amenus and Lauterbachius, their Enchiridions vpon both the Testaments (though Prudentius were thought to be the Author of the first:) haue we not Boius,