Memoires of Mr. Des-Ecotais: formerly stiled in the Church of Rome the most venerable Father Cassianus of Paris, priest and preacher of the Order of the Capucins. Or, The motives of his conversion. Divided into two parts. I. That the doctrin of the now Roman church is not grounded neither upon the Holy Scripture; neither upon the belief of the primitive church or the authority of the Holy Fathers, which is more particularly and more evidently verified in the examination of the belief of Rome concerning the Eucharist. II. That the church of Rome is not the true church; that it doth not enjoy, as absolutely its own, out-shutting all other churches, neither the antiquity of the belief, neither the multitude of the people, neither the true and lawful succession of the bishops; that the authority thereof is not infallible, and that it is full of errors and corruptions.
- Title
- Memoires of Mr. Des-Ecotais: formerly stiled in the Church of Rome the most venerable Father Cassianus of Paris, priest and preacher of the Order of the Capucins. Or, The motives of his conversion. Divided into two parts. I. That the doctrin of the now Roman church is not grounded neither upon the Holy Scripture; neither upon the belief of the primitive church or the authority of the Holy Fathers, which is more particularly and more evidently verified in the examination of the belief of Rome concerning the Eucharist. II. That the church of Rome is not the true church; that it doth not enjoy, as absolutely its own, out-shutting all other churches, neither the antiquity of the belief, neither the multitude of the people, neither the true and lawful succession of the bishops; that the authority thereof is not infallible, and that it is full of errors and corruptions.
- Author
- Des Ecotais, Louis.
- Publication
- London: :: Printed by W. Godbid, and are to be sold by Moses Pitt ...,
- 1677.
- Rights/Permissions
-
This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.
- Subject terms
- Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/B08923.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"Memoires of Mr. Des-Ecotais: formerly stiled in the Church of Rome the most venerable Father Cassianus of Paris, priest and preacher of the Order of the Capucins. Or, The motives of his conversion. Divided into two parts. I. That the doctrin of the now Roman church is not grounded neither upon the Holy Scripture; neither upon the belief of the primitive church or the authority of the Holy Fathers, which is more particularly and more evidently verified in the examination of the belief of Rome concerning the Eucharist. II. That the church of Rome is not the true church; that it doth not enjoy, as absolutely its own, out-shutting all other churches, neither the antiquity of the belief, neither the multitude of the people, neither the true and lawful succession of the bishops; that the authority thereof is not infallible, and that it is full of errors and corruptions." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/B08923.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 8, 2024.
Contents
- title page
- title page
-
DEDICATION.
-
A MONSEIGNEUR Illustrissime et Reverendissime
HENRY, Evéque de LONDRES,Doyen de la Chapelle du Roy, Et un des SEIGNEURSDu Conseil Privé de sa Majesté. -
To the Right Honourable AND Right Reverend Father in God
HENRY, Lord Bishop of LONDON:Dean of His Majesties Chappel, AND ONEOf His most Honourable Privy Council.
-
A MONSEIGNEUR Illustrissime et Reverendissime
-
TABLE.
- INTRODUCTION.
-
PREMIERE PARTIE. Que la Doctrine de l'EgliseRomaine n'est point fondée ny sur les Escritures, ny sur la Creance de la Primitive Eglise, ny sur l'Authorité des Saints Peres.-
CHAP. I. Commant j'ay connu que la Doctrine de l'EgliseRomaine n'est point fondée sur l'Ecriture. -
CHAP. II. Commant je connûs qu les Articles de foy de l'EgliseRomaine ne sont point fondés sur la Creance de la Primitive Eglise, ny sur l'Authorité des Saints Peres.- INTRODUCTION.
-
Section I. Que la Creance deRome touchant la Pre∣sence Reéle au sens de la Transubstatiati∣on, est une Doctrine nouvelle dans l'Eglise. -
Section II. Que ceque l'on enseigne du Sacrifice dela Messe dans l'EgliseRomaine, est une Doctrine contraire àla Creance de la Primitive Eglise. -
Section III. Que la maniere d'Administrer l'Eucharistie dans l'EgliseRomaine est tout à fait differente et bien opposée à celle dont on se servoit dans les premiers Siecles de l'Eglise. - Conclusion de cette Premiere Partie.
-
-
Seconde Partie. Que l'EgliseRomaine n'est point la verita∣ble Eglise, que son Authorité n'est point Infaillible, et qu'elle n'est remplie que de Corruptions et d'Erreurs.
-
TABLE.
- INTRODUCTION.
-
FIRST PART. That the Doctrin of theRoman Church is not grounded neither upon the belief of the Primitive Church, or the Authority of the Holy Fathers.-
CHAP. I. How I understood that the Doctrin of theRoman Church is not grounded upon the Scripture. -
CHAP. II. How I understood that the Articles of Faith of theRoman Church are not grounded upon the Belief of the Primitive Church, nor upon the Authority of the Holy Fathers.- INTRODUCTION.
-
Section I. That the belief ofRome about the real Presence in the sense of Transub∣stantiation, is a new Doctrin in the Church. -
Section II. That that which is taught of the Sacri∣fice of the Mass in the Church ofRome, is a Doctrin contrary to the belief of the Primitive Church. -
Section III. That the manner of Administring the Sacrament in theRoman Church is quite different, and very much op∣posed to that to which they were used in the first Ages of the Church. - Conclusion of the First Part.
-
-
Second Part. That the Church ofRome is not the true Church; that it's Authority is not Infallible; and that it is full of Corruptions and Errors.
-
part - 1
- half title
- MEMOIRES.
-
PREMIERE PARTIE. La Doctrine de l'EgliseRomaine n'est point fondée, ny sur les Escritures, ny sur la Creance de la Primitive Eglise, ny sur l'Authorité des Saints Peres.-
CHAP. I. Comment j'ay compris, que la Doctrine de l'Eglise Romaine, n'est point fondée sur l'Ecriture.-
§. 1. La Lecture de l'Escriture Sainte me disposa à reconnoistre les Erreurs de
Rome. - §. 2. Les Erreurs de l'Eglise Romaine, dont J'estois persuadé, me firent trouver dans les Escritures bien des Difficultés, bien des Insuffisances, et bien des Contradictions.
- §. 3. Circonstances qui contribuerent à l'avancement de ma Conversion.
- §. 4. Conclusion de ce Chapitre: Que les Articles de Foy de l'Egli∣se Romaine, ne se peuvent prou∣ver par l'Escriture.
-
§. 1. La Lecture de l'Escriture Sainte me disposa à reconnoistre les Erreurs de
-
CHAP. II. Comment je connûs, que les Arti∣cles de Foy de l'EgliseRomaine, ne sont point fondez sur la Cre∣ance de la Primitive Eglise, ny sur l'Anthorité des SaintsPeres. -
INTRODUCTION. La lecture des Livres de laPerpetuité de la Foy, sur le sujet de l'Eucharistie, fut cequi me donna occasion d'exami∣ner en particulier la Creance de l'EgliseRomaine, sur cette Matiere. -
Division des Erreurs de l'Eglise de
Rome, touchant l'Eucharistie. -
SECT. I. La Creance deRome, touchant la Presence Reéle, et la Transub∣stantiation, est une Doctrine nou∣velle dans l'Eglise.- I. Premiere Preuve tirée des Argu∣ments, dont les Peres de l'Eglise se sont servis, en disputant contre les Idolatres.
- II. Seconde preve tirée des Raisons, dont les Peres se servoient, pour disputer contre les Heretiques.
-
III. Troisiement Pruve, tirée de la ma
niere dont les Peres s'exprimen sur le sujet de ce St. Sacrement. - IV. Quatriéme Preuve, tirée de la Nouvauté de cette Doctrine de la Transubstantiation.
-
SECT. II. Ce que l'on enseigne, dans l'EgliseRo∣maine, du Sacrifice de la Messe est une Doctrine contraire à Creance de la Primitive Eglise.-
I. En quel sens, il est veritable de dire, que le St. Sacrement est u
Sacrifice. -
II. Que le Pretendu Sacrifice Propitia∣toire de l'Eglise
Romaine, est con∣traire à l'Escriture. - III. Ce qui a donné occasion à cette Erreur, et les degrez de Cor∣ruption, qui ont avancé cette Creance.
-
IV. Que l'Abus épouvantable, qui s'est glissé dans l'Eglise
Romaine, d'offrir leurs Sacrifices en l'honneur des Saints est une Pratique contrire à celle de la Primitive Eglise.
-
I. En quel sens, il est veritable de dire, que le St. Sacrement est u
-
SECT. III. Que la Maniere d'Administrer l'Eu∣charistie, dans l'EgliseRomaine, est tout à fait Different et bien Opposée à celle, dont on se ser∣voit, dans les Premiers Siecles de l'Eglise.- I. Du temps des Apôtres et dans les Premiers Siecles de l'Eglise, on Com∣munioit le Peuple sous les Especes du Pain et du Vin: on Adoroit point l'Hostie: et l'on Celebroit les Saints Mysters en Langue Vul∣gaire.
-
II. L'Origine de toutes les Erreurs de l'Eglise
Romaine, en l'Admini∣stration du Sacrement.
-
-
CONCLƲSION DE CETTE PREMIERE PARTIE. Que les Articles de Foy de l'E∣gliseRomaine, ne se peuvent prouver, ny par la Pratique de la Primitive Eglise, ny par le Témoignage des Anciens Peres.
-
- MEMOIRES.
-
FIRST PART. The Doctrin of theRoman Church is grounded neither upon the Scripture, nor upon the belief of the Primitive Church, nor the Authority of the Holy Fathers.-
CHAP. I. How I understood the Doctrin of theRoman Church to be not grounded upon the Scripture.-
§. I. The Reading of the Scripture disposed me before-hand to acknowledge the Errors ofRome. -
§ 2. The Errors of theRoman Church, whereof I was perswaded, made me find in the Scriptures many diffi∣culties, many insufficiencies, and many contradictions. -
§. 3. Circumstances which did contribute to hasten my Conversion. -
§. 4. The Conclusions of this Chapter. How I came to know that the Articles of faith ofRome, cannot be proved by Scripture.
-
-
CHAP. II. How I understood the Articles of Faith of theRoman Church not to be grounded on the belief of the Pri∣mitive Church, neither on the Au∣thority of the Holy Fathers.-
INTRODUCTION. The Reading of the Books concerningthe Perpetuity of Faith in the Eucharist, was an occasion to me to examin in particular the belief ofRome about that matter. -
Division of the Errors of the
Roman Church concerning the Matters of the Eucharist. -
SECT. I. The Belief ofRome about the real Presence with Transub∣stantiation, is a new Doctrin in the Church.-
I. First proof drawn out of the rea∣sons wherewith the Fathers of the Church were used to dispute against the Heathens. -
II. Second Proof drawn out of the Reasons wherewith the same Fathers were wont to dispute against the Hereticks. -
III. Third Proof drawn out of the man∣ner whereafter the Fathers were wont to speak of this Holy Sacrament. -
IV. Fourth Proof drawn out of the No∣velty of the Doctrin teaching Transub∣stantiation.
-
-
SECT. II. The Belief ofRome about theSacrifice of the Mass, is contrary to the belief of the Primitive Church.-
I. In what sense it is true to say that the Holy Sacrament is a Sacrifice. -
II. The pretended Propitiatory Sacrifice of theRoman church, is contrary to the Scripture. -
III. What has given occasion to that Error and the Degrees of Corruption which brought forth that Belief. -
IV. The horrid abuse of theRoman Church to offer Sacrifice in the honour of Saints, is a practice contrary to that of the Primitive Church.
-
-
Sect. III. The Manner of Administring the Sacrament in theRoman Church is quite different and very much opposed to that which they used in the First Ages of the Church.-
I. In the time of the Apostles and the First Ages of the Church, they gave the Communion to all the People under Both Kinds, they Worshipped not the Host, nor celebrated the Holy My∣steries in an Unknown Tongue. -
II. The beginning of all the Errors of theRoman Church in the administra∣tion of the Sacrament.
-
-
-
CONCLUSION OF THE FIRST PART. The Articles of theRoman Church cannot be proved, either by the Practice of the Primitive Church, or by the Authority of the Ancient Fathers.
-
-
THE SECOND PART.
-
SECONDE PARTIE. Que l'EgliseRomaine n'est poinla Veritable Eglise, que so Authorité n'est point Infailli∣ble, qu'elle n'est remplie qu de Corruptions & d'Erreurs. -
INTRODUCTION. La Providence fit naistre des occasion qui me firent prendre la resoluti
d'examiner serieusement les Pri cipes, sur lesquels est fondé l'Artic de l'Authorité de l'Eglise Romaine -
1. L'occasion, qui fut cause que j'e
minay de nouveau tous les Arti de Foy de l'Eglise Romaine, lesqu je reduisois tous à l'Authorité cette Eglise. - 2. L'Occasion que j'eus de douter de l'Infaillibilité du Pape, me fit pren∣dre la Resolution d'examiner de nouveau & sans Passion, sur quoy est fondée l'Authorité, dont l'Eglise Romaine se vante si fort.
-
3. Les Circonstances avec lesquell
je commancay de faire cet Exame & quel est mon dessein dans le R cit que j'en fais icy.
-
1. L'occasion, qui fut cause que j'e
-
CHAPITRRE I. Des pretenduës Fondements de l'Authoritè de Eglise Romaine.
-
SECTION I. Quel'Antiquité, laMultitude & laSuccession, ne sont point des Privi∣leges que l'Eglise Romaine posse∣de, pardessus les autres Eglises. -
SECTION. II. Que nyl'Antiquité, ny laMultitude ny laSuccession ne sont point des Mar∣ques Infaillibles de la Veritable E∣glise, & par consequent qu'une Eglise peut avoir toutes ces marques, & ne pas laisser d'estre Heretique. -
CONCLUSION. Que c'est la
Succession de la veritable Doctrine depuis les Apôtres qui est une Marque Infaillible de la Veri∣table Eglise, & que l'Eglise deRome qui n'a point la Succession de la veritable Doctrine, n'a pas sujet de se vanter, ny de l'Antiquité, ny de laMultitude, ny de laSuccession.
-
-
CHAPITRE II. Des Fondements veritables de l'E∣glise Romaine d'apresent.
-
SECTION I. De l'Ambition des Papes.
- §. 1. Le Pape s'éleve au dessus des Roys, au lieu que de droit il deve∣roit leur estre soûmis.
-
§ 2. Le Pape s'éleve au dessus de toutes les Eglises en s'attribuant in∣justement la
Primauté & le Tî∣tre d'Evéque Ʋniversel; & que s'attribuer ce Tître c'est un Blas∣pheme & une Apostasie dans le Christianisme. - § 3. Que l'Ambition des Papes va jus∣qu'à l'Impieté.
-
SECTION II. De l'Avarice des Papes. - Conclusion de cette seconde Partie. Que l'Eglise Romaine n'estant fon∣dée que sur les principes que j'ay rapportez, est tombée dans la Corruption & dans l'Erreur.
-
CONCLƲSION GENERALE. Que j'estois engagé de sortir de l'Eglise deRome, aprés que Dieu m'en eut fair connoistre les Erreurs par les degrez que j'ay marquez, dans les deux Parties de ce Discours.-
§. 1. L'occasion d'un Sermon que je pré∣chay sur le sujet du Sacrement me rappella dans l'Esprit toutes les idées que j'avois des Erreurs de
Rome. - §. 2. Les repugnances que je souffris & les difficultés qu'il me fallut sur∣monter.
-
§. 3. Les Raisons que je meditay pour retarder ma Conversion. -
§. 4. Dieu me fit vivement compren∣dre le grand peché que c'est que de s'opposer au Saint Esprit, & ainsi acheva ma Conversion en me faisant genereusement abandonner la Com∣munion de
Rome.
-
§. 1. L'occasion d'un Sermon que je pré∣chay sur le sujet du Sacrement me rappella dans l'Esprit toutes les idées que j'avois des Erreurs de
-
SECTION I. De l'Ambition des Papes.
-
INTRODUCTION. La Providence fit naistre des occasion qui me firent prendre la resoluti
-
SECOND PART. The Church ofRome is not the true Church, its Authority is not in∣fallible, and that it is full of Corruptions and Errours.-
INTRODƲCTION. The Divine Providence brought forth some occasions, which made me re∣solve to examine the very first grounds of the question concerning the Autho∣rity of the
Roman Church.-
1. The occasion I had to examine a∣new all the Articles of Faith of theRoman Church, which I reduced all to the Authority of the same Church. -
2. The occasion I had to doubt of the infallibility of thePope, made me resolve the examine again and with∣out passion, upon what the Autho∣rity, which the Church ofRome boasts so much of, is grounded. -
3. Circumstances wherewith I began to examine the Authority of theRoman Church, and what is my design in the rehearsal of them.
-
-
CHAPTER I. The pretended grounds of the Authority of the Roman Church.-
SECTION I. Antiquity, Multitude, and Successi∣on are not Priviledges of the Roman Church, above all other Churches. -
SECTION II. That neitherAntiquity, norMulti∣tude, norSuccession are infallible marks of the true Church, and con∣sequently that one Church may have them all, and, with them all, be an Heretical Church. -
CONCLƲSION. That it is the
Succession of the true Doctrine from the Apostles, which is an Infallible mark of the true Church; and that the Church ofRome which hath the Succession of Doctrine, hath no reason to boast neither of itsAntiquity, nor of itsMultitude norSuccession.
-
-
CHAPTER II. The true Grounds of the now Ro∣man Church.-
SECTION I. The Ambition of the
Popes. -
§. 1. The Pope exalts himself above all Kings, whereas by right he ought to be submitted to them. -
§ 2. The Pope exalts himself above all Churches, taking unjustly to him∣self the titel ofUniversal Bishop; That it is a Blasphemy, and an Apo∣stasie in Christendome to take upon him such a title. -
§ 3. That the Ambition of the Popes extends it felf as far as Impiety.
-
-
SECTION II. The Covetousness of the Popes. - Conclusion of the second Part. That the Roman Church being founded upon the principles which I have rehearsed, is fallen into Corruption and Error.
-
GENERAL CONCLUSION. That I was engaged to go out of the Church ofRome, where∣of God Almighty made me know the errors by the degrees I have rehearsed in the two parts of this discourse.-
§. 1. The occasion of a Sermon about the Sacrament called again in my mind all the notions I had of the Errours ofRome. -
§. 2. The difficulties I suffered and the oppositions I had to overcome. -
§. 3. The reasons which I thought upon in my mind to defer my conversion. -
§. 4. God makes me understand, how great sin it is to withstand the Ho∣ly Ghost, anso makes an end of my conversion, and brings me out of the Communion of Rome.
-
-
SECTION I. The Ambition of the
-
INTRODƲCTION. The Divine Providence brought forth some occasions, which made me re∣solve to examine the very first grounds of the question concerning the Autho∣rity of the
-