SECT. I. Religious Vows are allow∣able.
OUr Adversary saies, that the Gift of Con∣tinency is presupposed afore one make the Vow, so that if one find by Experience, that he has it not, he is obliged not to Vow; or if he has Vowed rashly, flattering himself he had this Gift, he is no more engaged by his former Vow, but may in this case, nay perhaps is oblig∣ed to secure himself from Sin by a Lawful Marri∣age, it being better in this conjuncture to Marry then Burne.
Answer. First, I retort the Argument thus. The Gift of conjugal Continency is equally presup∣posed to the promise made in Marriage. May then a Man or Woman who find's by Experience in a short absence, or Sickness of the other party, that they have not that Gift, think themselves free from their promise, and take another Wife or Hus∣band?
Secondly, I Answer that those Gifts are neither presupposed to the one, nor to the other, but it is presupposed that God will give those Gifts to those who ask them, or Grace to resist Temptations as