An answer, to a little book call'd Protestancy to be embrac'd or, A new and infallible method to reduce Romanists from popery to Protestancy
About this Item
- Title
- An answer, to a little book call'd Protestancy to be embrac'd or, A new and infallible method to reduce Romanists from popery to Protestancy
- Author
- Con, Alexander.
- Publication
- [Aberdeen? :: s.n.],
- Printed in the year, 1686.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Abercromby, David, d. 1701 or 2. -- Protestancy to be embrac'd.
- Catholic Church -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/B02310.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"An answer, to a little book call'd Protestancy to be embrac'd or, A new and infallible method to reduce Romanists from popery to Protestancy." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/B02310.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.
Pages
Page [unnumbered]
TO THE READER.
AT this time, in which all that comes from Pen or Pulpit a∣gainst Popery, is of so good Coyn with PROTESTANTS. that they have Re-printed a late in Scotland, (to a∣muse more the Ignorant People,) a little Book bearing for the Title, A New Method, &c. I have resolved to put an Answer of it to the Press.
Altho' it pleases the Author to call it New, I scarce find any New thing in it; it containing hardly any thing
Page [unnumbered]
which has not been Objected and An∣swered. His turn indeed from the R. Catholick Religion to the Prote∣stant, was then New, but it, and all its Circumstances being of small or no importance to the publick. I take no notice of it.
For the Dogmatical part of his Book, since he runs through allmost all our Articles, endeavouring so to blemish every one with his Pen, that his Book seems more to be a Slan∣derous Libel, then a Confutation of our Religion, I have thought it was not amiss to give it such an Answer, as might be both a Solution to what is Objected, and an Explanation of our Tenets in that manner, that it may appear how much they wrong us, when the R. Catholick Religion is represented to the Common Peo∣ple as groundless and full of Super∣stition.
And for this latter Reason, Cour∣teous
Page [unnumbered]
Reader, you will excuse me, if I am a little longer then seem'd to require the Answer of so small a matter. To make my Work less te∣dious to those who will do me the Honour to Read it. I have divided the whole into several Chapters, Sections, and Subsections, with Titles relating to their different Sub∣jects.
Fare-well.