Page 68
SECT. VII. The learned Protestants do hold, the promises of the Go∣spel not to be absolute, but conditional.
THere is one Objection more, which I think good to remove, and that is this. The learned Protestants, as by name Bucanus,* 1.1 and some others, make this main difference between the Law and the Gospel, that the pro∣mises of the Law were conditional; but the promises of the Gospel sunt gratuitae, are free promises. It may seem therefore, that Mr. S. and those that teach, as he doth, do preach true Protestant Doctrine, and that we which teach otherwise, have revolted, and departed from the Protestant Religion, at leastwise in this particu∣lar.
[Answ.] But I answer, It is nothing so; for Bucanus ex∣plaineth himself, and sheweth what he meaneth by the conditions, which he speaketh of, to wit, such as are causae, causes of the blessings that are promised. Whereas there∣fore the Gospel saith, si credideris, if thou shalt believe, particula [si] non est 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉: this particle if, is not a note of a cause, but of a consequence, saith he. Now this we do willingly grant, that remission of sins, and salvation are freely promised in the Gospel, and that our faith and repentance are no causes of them.
Bucanus therefore teacheth altogether as we do; for in the next words he saith, that our faith or our believing non est causa, vel meritum, sed modus vel instrumentum, sine quo non potest fieri applicatio beneficiorum Christi, is not a cause or merit, but a meanes or instrument, without which there can be no application of Christs benefits unto us. And if this be not enough, he saith afterwards in expresse words, that Jeremy calleth the Law of Moses, being considered by it self, and in it self, the legal and old Covenant, because it was the covenant of our creation, whereby the Lord required of us perfect obedience, to