Page 190
THESIS VII. (Book 7)
Christi regnum in terra: Christs millenar reign. (Book 7)
THis is a very dubious dogmat or difficil debat, raised * 1.1 in the Apostles dais; which som Orthodox Fathers defended, but others decried and detested: the chief grounds wherof on both sides, shal be sincerely deli∣vered; specialy from Rob, Baily a Scot on the Negativ, part, and Joseph Mede a most learned Divine for the Affirmitiv. Tros Tyrius{que} mihi nullo discrimino agetur.
Cerinthus a prime pestilent Heretic hatchd this Cockatrice, * 1.2 which Papias an Apostolic Man fostered, and Justin Martyr much favored: whos steps other primitiv Fathers (specialy Lactantius) mor or less folowed: yet in after ages the Catholic Church and som Oecumenic Councils condemned it. So it lay long buried in obscurity or oblivion, til som late Anabaptists and Independents their Allies raked it out of grav. Howbeit al Protestants rejected it since revicton, til Alsted returning from Transylvania, renewed som parts of this poison; which Piscator (a Man more heady and humorous then judicious) swalowed: but they disagree in divers points, as Sectists use to doo. Thes laid the foundation, but Mr. Archer advanced the main fabric: which Mr. Burroughs in his London Lectures on Hosea, pressed as a most comfortable Article of Christian Religion, to be instilled into the hearts of al tru Beleevers. Sundry other Sectators published or proclamed it with Trum∣pets: who like Presbyterians, (which wherever they find Elders named, think it rings a peal for their motly Disciplin) wrest the one thousand yeers mentioned by David, Peter, and John to Christs millenar reign in person on Earth before or at the general Judgment, straining Scriptures to serv their turn.