Hell broke loose: or An history of the Quakers both old and new.: Setting forth many of their opinions and practices. Published to antidote Christians against formality in religion and apostasie. By Thomas Underhill citizen of London.

About this Item

Title
Hell broke loose: or An history of the Quakers both old and new.: Setting forth many of their opinions and practices. Published to antidote Christians against formality in religion and apostasie. By Thomas Underhill citizen of London.
Author
Underhill, Thomas.
Publication
London :: Printed for Simon Miller at the Starre in St. Paul's Church-yard,
1660.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Quakers
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A95789.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Hell broke loose: or An history of the Quakers both old and new.: Setting forth many of their opinions and practices. Published to antidote Christians against formality in religion and apostasie. By Thomas Underhill citizen of London." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A95789.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 2, 2024.

Pages

Postscript.

IF any enemies of the Christian Ministry and Ordinances shall take of∣fence at my seeking to the Civil or Military Power to support Religion, contrary to the Great Church-door, which is erected for the letting out of the Reformed Religion, and the letting in of Popery, I mean this As∣sertion, That the Magistrate, qua Magistrate, is not to meddle with matters of Religion. My Defence is this, That the contrary is my be∣lief, and my addresse is the exercising the Liberty of my Conscience; And why may not I that so believe more acceptably move the Higher Powers for Religion, then they against it, who therein cross their own profes∣sed opinion, as they have very much done of late years, by the multitude of motions, in Councels, Books, Papers, Letters, which they have sent or delivered unto every pretended Authority for these many years for the pulling down the Ministry and the Steeple-houses, and the obtaining leave to disturb all the Ministers and Assemblies, contrary unto their way. Their very importuning the Magistrate to pull down the publick Mini∣stry and worship, is a yeelding the cause, and an owning his Authori∣ty in the matters in question, though thereby they contradict them∣selves, while they say, he hath no such Authority, which if they did believe to be a truth, they would move him, in stead of pulling them down, to let them alone, as matters beyond the sphere of his calling. And un∣doubtedly if the Magistrate, as such, ought not to meddle with the things of Religion, then it is a sinne for him to pull down, as well as build. Oh the worth of a truly tender conscience, how rare is it!

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.