Page 167
(9. Head of Contradiction to Scripture.) Concerning Christian Warfare.
HAving noted their denial of Saints to be always in the Warfare, R. F. * 1.1 returns me his justification of this Doctrine; If they do, they deny not the Scripture, but agree with it. How makes he it out? Why, Such as have overcome are more then con∣querors.
Rep. This is a truth in some sense, but proves not that* 1.2 Saints are past the warfare. Every Christian is an over∣comer as well as a warrior; but how? when, and in what measure?
1. In Christ his Head and Captain he hath overcome, 1 Cor. 15. 57.
2. When shall he have a perfect conquest over inherent corruption? when the warfare is at an end; when is that? when his wayfare is at an end, not before.
3. In what measure is it wrought here? In some more, in some less (as to the conquest of Sanctification, of which is the Question) in none absolutely and totally. A victory the Saint may have to day, in some particular combate, a foil to morrow. Shameful foils some of these men have had, who have thought themselves at an end of their warfare, if half that which is reported be true. That of Atkinson at Norwich, was true enough, one who cryed up Perfection as loud as his fellows, but became as unstable as water, and was easily captivated to the act of Fornication. I list not to rake in such kennels, but I abhor boasting before the final victory. That practice which violateth the seventh Com∣mandment, is as far from perfection, as that Doctrine which contradicteth the seventh Chapter to the Rom. 23.
R. F. tells me, Thou brings that of Paul in the warfare; but thou brings not his after experience, where he says,