Rep. Who calls (that calls from Scripture) for honor to any for their pride, and covetousness and oppression? This is but a shift of R. F. Is not the ordinance of superiority, in State, Church, Family, set up among men to be honored? and cannot men set up by that ordinance, be honored, but they must be honored for their sins? Sin we all know, is a reproach to any person, as to any nation. But the relation wherein God hath set them above others is an honor to them, put upon them by God himself, and are not they to be honored, as, and so far as he hath honored them? viz. as Magistrates, as Ministers, as Parents, as Masters, considered abstractly from their bad qualities? and onely lookt upon in their place of superiority representing God, and bearing his image of authority, which though lost by the fall, yet God hath given back, in some respect, to all men; Hence the Rule, 1 Pet. 2. 17. Honor all men; all men, as men, not Beasts; and some men, as preferred by the Lord before other. But saith R. F.
2 All men that are joyned to the Lord, and walk in union with him, and his seed, I honor and love, and this I speak in sincerity.
Rep. This is no demonstration of giving civil honor, or knowing what belongs to it, which was-by him at first pro∣fessed. Did R. F. not onely speak, but act this in sincerity, yet there is an ignorant simplicity mixed with his sincerity, while he thinketh, that love to Saints must exclude his love to other men; and if he can love his enemies, as he saith, civil honor is a branch of love to be given to them that are not joyned to the Lord and walk with him, though they be his enemies; which of the martyrs refused to give civil honor to their persecuting enemies, when called before them? But saith R. F. again,
3. To follow foolish idle fancies, to worship men with cap and knee, and flatteries, as the Serpents seed do, and which thou pleads for, we do that deny, and against it testifie.
Rep. Here he still mingleth the corruption of the act, with the act; as if they could not be separated. If onely he denies foolish, idle complements, for insinuation sake, and in a way of flattery, that we deny also; but to judge the