IHad noted how they pretended to be immediately taught. The teaching of God (saith one) is immediate in the least degree: contrary to Dan. 9. 1. 1 Tim 4. 14. R. F. answereth * 1.1 We do not pretend so to be, but we witness that we are so taught, and according to the promise of the Lord.
Rep. 1. But who will believe him, and his fellows, when the witness is of themselves, from themselves, and without proof? They that flee to an experience, and a promise for proof, must first shew the promise, and then the perfor∣mance of it to themselves. I am yet to learn the promise of the Immediate Teachings of God, to be given to all that are to teach others, of which is the question. The promise, John 6. 45. They shall all be taught of God, concerneth all* 1.2 that have truly believed, do, or shall so believe; all the children of Gods election, all the children of the Church-Catholique, and of the new Jerusalem, Isa. 54. 13. which teaching, if God had intended to be given immediately, i. e. without any medium, means, or instrument, then would he not have sent Preachers abroad for them to hear, thereby to be taught and drawn to believing.
2. Had all that the Lord sent forth as Gospel-dispensers, immediate teaching? we grant Paul had it more immedi∣ately,* 1.3 more fully, and more at once, then the rest of the Apostles, Gal. 1. 12. and 2. 6. will R. F. and his Brethren witness the same immediate teaching, with Paul, and the utmost height of his revelation, that nothing can be added to them? We grant the rest of the Apostles had the imme∣diate teaching, and ducture of the Spirit in their preaching and writing: But are all Apostles? 1 Cor. 12. 28. compared with Ephes. 4. 11. There was a second sort of the Ministers