Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 4.

Obj. IS any Church now extant so infallable, that it needeth no advice of any?

Ans. No Church ought to be so esteemed upon earth; infalla∣bility* 1.1 ought only to be ascribed to the Spirit of God, in the Scrip∣tures; and for matter of advice, and counsell, in any Spirituall matter, it is requisite, that one Church make use of another, as the Church of Antioch, did of the Church at Jerusalem, but not absolutely to depend upon them.

Obj. Did not the Church of Antioch, depend upon the determi∣nate conclusion, of the Church at Jerusalem? Act. 15. 2.

Ans. The text doth not say, that they did absolutely depend* 1.2 upon it, but that it sent to the Church at Jerusalem about the que∣stion; which doth imply, that it was only to advise with them, or to crave their judgements, in the matter in controversie, and not to resolve, right, or wrong, to depend upon their judgements; as also in that the Messengers which were sent, were Apostles, as

Page 299

the other were, to whom they were sent, and as infallible as the other, and so their equals, as the Apostle Paul testifieth of him∣selfe, Gal. 2. 6. Againe, suppose that the Church at Jerusalem had determined, that the Church at Antioch, should have admit∣ted of Circumcision, and enjoyned it upon the Brethren at An∣tioch, were either the Apostles, or them of Antioch, bound to have obeyed them decrees, knowing that all such Ceremonies were ended in Christ?

Obj. No, in that they ought to have obeyed God, rather then Man.

Ans. Then you conclude, that such injunctions as be comman∣ded* 1.3 by the greatest authority, being contrary to the Word of God, ought not to be obeyed; and if so, why ought we now to depend upon a Presbiterian Sined, who are farre inferiour to the Apostles? or to obey them in such commands, as are as contrary to the will and appointment of Jesus Christ, as Circumcision was to them of Antioch, being abolished as aforesaid?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.