Page 281
CHAP. IIII. Treateth of Johns, and of Christs Baptisme, &c.
Objection. IT seemeth there was a difference betwixt the Baptisme of John, and that of Christ, Act. 19. 3. 4. 5. in regard that the Apostle is said to Baptize again, such as were formerly baptized, by Johns Baptisme?
Ans. It was requisite that Beleevers should not only be baptized to him that was to come (to which only Johns Baptisme did tend) but that also they should be baptized in his* 1.1 name, being already come; for otherwise, the Baptisme of John, and the Baptisme of the Apostles were all one, and the same, both of them Preaching, and Baptizing, to repentance, as wil appeare by comparing Luke 3. 36. with Act. 2. 31. so that divers hands doth not make the Baptisme divers.
Obj. BƲt it seemeth that the Baptisme in the name of the Lord Jesus, was not altogether sufficient of it selfe, without the gift of the Holy Ghost, which the Apostles is said to give unto them (who had been formerly baptized, in the name of the Lord Jesus) by the laying on of their hands, as in Act. 8. 16, 17.
Ans. The gift of the Holy Ghost was a thing which was not* 1.2 alwaies confined to the act of Baptisme, yea very seldome or ne∣ver, as I have shewed; neither did the Apostles or any other of∣fend, in not giving it at that present time of Baptisme, (in regard there was no such command given by our Saviour to his Apostles, as that the one, should not be administred without the other, or that he, that had not the donation of the Holy Ghost, should not administer the Sacrament of Baptisme, as appeares by the Sama∣ritans who received that Sacrament, and not the Holy Ghost imediatly, at the same instant, as an inseperable concomitant