Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 3.

Obj. BY your expressions, I perceive you would not have Infants admitted to the Sacrament of Baptisme?

Ans. We ought not to admit any as Members, of the Church* 1.1 of Christ, until they be capable of the profession of a Christian, would you not think it a meere madnesse to binde an Infant to a Trade, before it can either goe or speake?

Obj. Yes certainly it were a madnesse indeed, but what of that?

Ans. It is as great a folly in Parents to desire, or the Church to* 1.2 admit of such Infants, as Members of the Church of Christ, and so consequently professors of his Name (for the Apostle saith, that as many as are baptized into Christ, have put 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Christ Gal. 3. 27.) before they know either the Church, or Christ.

Obj. By these expressions you shew your selfe contrary to the judgements both of the Presbiterians, Independants, &c.

Ans. By them words, I shew my selfe such an one, as would be guided and directed by the precepts and examples of Christ, and his Apostles.

Obj. Did not Christ and his Apostles allow of Infants, as Mem∣bers of his Church?

Ans. The elect of them he did, and doth admit, as Members of his Church triumphant, but not of his Church Militant.

Obj. Did not the Apostles of Christ baptize Infants?

Ans. Where doe you read of any that they baptized?

Obj. True, we doe not read nominally that they did baptize in∣fants, but we read that they did baptize whole families (amongst which infants might be included) as the family of Lidia, the Jaylor, &c.

Ans. That is but a meere supposition, without any ground

Page 264

from the Word, for doe you thinke that Christ would leave the Sacrament of Baptisme, without a sufficient discovery to whom it did belong.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.