Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 2.

THe error of Community was first maintained by the Heathen,* 1.1 for Plato held that all things ought to be common; the same also was held by the Hereticks called Apostoloci, and attri∣buted* 1.2 in those dayes to them under the notion of Annabap∣tists, which particular I cannot beleeve of them; but if in case any of them be of that judgement, I hope these reasons following will convince them of that error.

Obj. The Apostles had all things common at Jerusalem, Act. 2. 44. &c. ergo.

Ans. That custome then was easie, because they were few, and necessary, for if they had not sold their possessions, and so made the common use, they by violence should have been strip∣ped of them; but now there is neither the like facility, or necessity.

2. That community was voluntary, not imposed upon any, for it was in their choyces whether they would sell their possessions or not, as Peter said to Annanias, Act. 5. 4. After it was sold, was it not in thy owne power, &c.

3. Neither were all things common amongst them, they had some things private and peculiar to themselves, as Mary had her proper house and dwelling in the City, Act. 12. 12.

4. This was not the generall custome of the whole Church, for in Achaia and Macedonia, there was gatherings made, for the Saints at Jerusalem, it was then particular for that place, and peculiar for that time; and therefore a generall rule for all times and places cannot be taken from hence.

Page 169

5. Neither were things so indifferently common, as that every man might take what he would, but the things in common were distributed as every man had need, Act. 5. 35.

Obj. Christ saith to the young man in the Gospel, Mark 10. 21. Goe and sell all that thou hast, and give to the poore, ergo we must do the like.

Ans. That was a personall precept, and belonged to them times, for the Apostles did leave their parents, and their hou∣ses, but we are not commanded to doe the like. Besides, our Savi∣our* 1.3 so said, to shew how farre he came short of the perfection of the Law, and to humble him, that thought so well of himselfe; againe, he saith not, make thy goods common, but give unto the poore.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.