Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 5.

Object. PEter certainly was the most eminent, because he was alwaies first named.

Ans. It is to be observed, that the twelve Patriarckes are not alwayes rehersed in the same manner or order, not in Gen. 49. 3. as in Gen. 27. and Gen. 30. and afterward, Numb. 1. & Deut. 33. yet in all these places Ruben is named first, but not alwayes, for sometimes Judah is named before him, as in Numb. 2. 3.

As then this were but a simple Argument for the prehemi∣nence of Ruben before his Brethren, because he is in the most places named first, being the eldest, so as simply doe they conclude for Peters supremacy before the other Apostles, because he is commonly named the first; which was rather because of his El∣dership then any priority before the rest; neither is he alwaies named in the first place, for Gal. 1. 9. the Apostle James is na∣med before him.

Againe, we doe not read that Peter did ever command his Fel∣lowes* 1.1 in office, but exhorted them; as in 1 Pet. 5. 1. he was also subject to accusation as well as the rest, instance concerning his preaching to Cornelius and his Family, for which being called to question by the rest of the Apostles purged himself, by ac∣quainting them with the whole matter, as we may read, Acts 11. 3. likewise being taxed by Paul for his dissimulation, Gal. 2. 8. by silence confesseth his fault; by all which it doth manifestly appeare, that there was no more superiority in Peter then in the rest of the Apostles.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.