Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 2. Human Lawes ought to forbid Fornication.

Obj. IF humane Lawes should punish Fornication, it would give occasion to Adultery, nest, &c. seeing the most of a Com∣mon-wealth are weake and imperfect, and if they were restrained from this smaller vice, they would fall into greater inormities.

Ans. Seeing God hath appointed a remedy against Fornicati∣on, and all other uncleanesse by lawfull Matrimony, why then should men make themselves wiser then God, and seeke to cure one evill by another; for in this manner is the Divine order per∣verted amongst men, by restraining of Marriage in their Priests, and giving way to Fornication; and therefore it is no marvell if such unlawfull lusts doe reigne amongst them.

Obj. Human Lawes are not to forbid all sins, because men make∣ing a Law cannot give preserving grace to keep it; and this was the cavse why Moses Law did not forbid all vices, because there was no grace given, or help ministred to avoyd them, therefr some things was permitted amongst them; as to take Ʋsry of the Gen∣tiles, to give a bill of divorcement, and such like.

Ans. By this reason human Lawes should forbid no sins, be∣cause Gods Word, and not mans Lawes giveth grace to astine from any sin. 2. Neither is there any sin forbidden in the New Testament against the Morall Law, which is not prohibited in the Old, as may appeare by our blessed Saviours interpretation of the Law, Mat. 3. wherein he giveth no new Law, but only expoundeth the old. 3. Though Moses Law gave no grace to keep it, yet because it was a Schoole-master to bring us unto Christ, Gal. 3. 19. it was fit it should be a perfect Law, and con∣taine a strict rule of all righteousnesse; that men the rather should be driven unto Christ, seeing themselves to come farre short in the performance of it as it ought to be. 4. The tollera∣tion of some things amongst the Israelites for their hardnesse of

Page 124

heart, sheweth not a defect in the Law, but an interpretation in them that could not be subject to the perfect rule of the Law. 5. Concerning the punishment of Fornication, it was not omit∣ted in Moses Law, for although Fornication with one was re∣cumpensed with Marriage, and paying of the Dowry, Deut. 22. 24. yet if a Daughter in Israel did play the Whore, she was sto∣ned to death, ibid. vers. 21. And seeing the Law saith, There shall not be a Whore amongst the Daughters of Israel, Deut. 23. 17. how dare any defend the tollerating, and suffering of Whores in Christian Common-wealths.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.