Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 4.

Obj. BƲt they further object thus: To restore that which is committed to a mans trust is a naturall duty; yet this is dispensed with, when as a man refuseth to restore to a Mad-man his sword or weapon, which he gave one to keep; so the Magistrat ordinarily dispenceth with that precept, Thou shalt not kill, when he commandeth Malefactors to be slaine: So also the Maccabees dispenced with the Sabbath, when they resolved to fight with their enemies on the Sabbath day, 1 Mac. . Chap. As these precepts then were dispenced withall by men, so may the rest.

Ans. For the first instance, there is in that particular case, no dispensation against the Law of Nature, for then by such dispensa∣tions it would be made lawfull, not to restore that which is com∣mitted to trust, which cannot be made lawfull by any dispensation; for this were to crosse and over-throw the Law of Nature, but not to restore a sword to a furious man, is but a particular inter∣pretation of that generall Law of Nature, wherein the inent of

Page 101

that Law is kept, for it is agreeable to the Law of Nature, to ren∣der whatsoever belongeth unto another; and the reason thereof is, because it is just. So it is lawfull by the same Law, (notwith∣standing) not to give unto a Mad-man his owne sword, because it is just. Also the meaning and reason of the Law is kept, because the furious man would doe some hurt with his weapon, and there∣fore to administer occasion and instrument unto his rage, were unjust.

In the other two particulars, there is no dispensation, but an interpretation rather, or declaration of the Law; as that it is no Murther when one is justly slaine. And in the other, that it is no breach of the Sabbath, when necessity compelleth to breake the rest thereof; but thus to dispence were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death, and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessity. 2. Thus to dispence were to make it lawfull afterward, which was not before such a dispensation; but it was alwayes lawfull for the Magistrate to put to death, and upon like necessity to intermit and suspend the rest of the Sabbath. 3. Besides these interpretations and de∣clarations of these Lawes, they are not devised by man, but war∣ranted in Scripture by the Lord himself, the Maker and Au∣thor of the Law, and therefore they are not to be interposed by any humane authority.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.