Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht

About this Item

Title
Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht
Author
Spittlehouse, John.
Publication
Printed at London :: by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at his house in Goold [sic] Smiths Alley in Redcrosse Street,
1650. [i.e. 1649]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Presbyterianism
Great Britain -- Church history
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature
Church of England -- Government -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93702.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 18, 2024.

Pages

SECT. 4. Why a Law was given to Adam.

Object. VVHy did the Lord give that precept to Adam?

Ans. For the better triall of Adams obedience, it was fit that he should be prohibited to doe that, which in it self was not evill, that Adam abstaining from that which was good, might shew his humanity to his Creator.

Obj. The Apostle saith, that the Law is not given to the righte∣ous man, but unto the disobedient; and Adam in his innocency was just and righteous, and therefore he needed not a law.

Ans. The Law in two respects is not to be given to a just man, as 1. In respect of the negative precept, as to abstaine from Mur∣der, Theft, Adultery, &c. but in regard of the affirmative pre∣cept, to returne them in obedience, and doing of good workes; and so the just man had need of a Law, and so had Adam. 2. A just man need not feare the punishment of the Law, as Paul speaketh in another place concerning the Magistrate (which i the speak∣ing, or living Law) who is not to be feared for doing good workes, but evill, Rom. 13. 4. and in this respect so long as Adam lived in his integrity, the punishment in the Law concerned him not.

Obi. Why did the Lord give that precept to Adam which he knew he could not keep?

Ans. I have answered formerly; but further, God gave him a Law which was possible to be kept, and Adam had power to keep it if he would; it was not then Gods fault that gave him Free∣will, but his owne that abused that gift.

Page 77

Obi. Why did not God give him grace to abstaine from transgres∣sing that precept?

Ans. God could have given him such grace, and to the Angels also, that they should not have fallen, but it was fit that God* 1.1 should leave the Creature to their Free-will, and not hinder the course of Nature which he had made; and albeit that God did fore-see mans transgression, yet that was no reason to with-hold the precept, for then God should neither have made Angels nor men, because he fore-saw that some of both should be reprobates; as also God by the same reason should not have given his written Word, because many Hereticks doe pervert it to their owne de∣struction. As therefore God fore-saw mans transgression, so like∣wise he knew how to turne it to good, as in shewing mercy to sinners, and in sending Christ to restore what man had lost; so that notwithstanding Gods fore-sight of Adams transgression, he was not to forbeare to charge Adam with this Commandement, in regard of the great good which he did fore-see should ensue by it.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.