The journal of Monsr. de Saint Amour doctor of Sorbonne,: containing a full account of all the transactions both in France and at Rome, concerning the five famous propositions controverted between the Jansenists and the Molinists, from the beginning of that affair till the Popes decision. / Faithfully rendred out of French. ; A like display of the Romish state, court, interests, policies, &c. and the mighty influences of the Jesuites in that church, and many other Christian states, being not hitherto extant.

About this Item

Title
The journal of Monsr. de Saint Amour doctor of Sorbonne,: containing a full account of all the transactions both in France and at Rome, concerning the five famous propositions controverted between the Jansenists and the Molinists, from the beginning of that affair till the Popes decision. / Faithfully rendred out of French. ; A like display of the Romish state, court, interests, policies, &c. and the mighty influences of the Jesuites in that church, and many other Christian states, being not hitherto extant.
Author
Saint-Amour, Louis-Gorin de, 1619-1687.
Publication
London :: Printed by T. Ratcliff, for George Thomason, at the Rose and Crown in S. Paul's Church-yard,
1664.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jansenists.
Molinism.
Jesuits -- Controversial literature.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93040.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The journal of Monsr. de Saint Amour doctor of Sorbonne,: containing a full account of all the transactions both in France and at Rome, concerning the five famous propositions controverted between the Jansenists and the Molinists, from the beginning of that affair till the Popes decision. / Faithfully rendred out of French. ; A like display of the Romish state, court, interests, policies, &c. and the mighty influences of the Jesuites in that church, and many other Christian states, being not hitherto extant." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A93040.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2024.

Pages

ARTICULUS II.
Sophismatis Moliniani dissolutio.

SI quis Bellarminum & Baronium Cardinales hoc argumento propter desensum Honorii summi Pontificis sensum, Monothelitanae haereseos ageret reos: Sexta Synodus oecumenica, item duae se∣quentes, ac duo summi Pontifices, Honorii Epi∣stolas & sensum utique damnarunt haereseos Mo∣nothelitanae. Vos defenditis sensum Honorii. Ergo Monothelitanae haereseos crimen suscipitis. Quaero quo pacto tanti viri a tam foedo & tam a∣perte falso crimine eximendi sint? Nimirum dete∣gendo argumenti vitio, quod constat quatuor ter∣minis, & sub Honorii sensu aequivocationem & fal∣laciam tegit.

Damnavit sensum Honorii sexta Synodus. Sen∣sum Honorii defendunt Bellarminus & Baronius. Sed non eundem sensum illa damnavit, isti defen∣dunt. Monothelitarum sensum in epistolis Hono∣rii esse credidit sexta Synodus, & ideo damna∣vit. At easdem epistolas Catholico sensu inter∣pretantur illustrissimi Cardinales, & ideo defen∣dunt. Non ergo Synodo adversantur in quaesti∣one juris, sed tantum in facto, id est, literarum Ho∣norii interpretatione.

Omnino duplici ratione hominis etiam ab Eccle∣sia damnati sensus defendi potest. Primo, ut ille

Page 159

ipse sensus, eademque sententia quam damnavit Ecclesia, defendatur. Hoc qui faciat, haereticus est. Secundo, ut alicujus auctoris sensus ab haeresi ad Catholicam fidem benigna interpretatione flec∣tatur. Hoc qui faciat, sit temerarius, sit prae∣postere benignus, haereticus certe dici non potest: non enim haereticum, sed Catholicum sensum de∣fendit.

Utroque modo defensus Origines, & utrumque defensions modum valde Patres pro sua aequitate secreverunt. Multi enim ipsos Origenis errores defenderunt. Ergo illi a Patribus pro haereticis habiti. Alii contra sic Origeni patrocinati sunt, ut illos errores falso illi ascriptos esse certarent, ejusque verba durius accipi contenderent. Hi non sectatores, sed defensores Originis ab Augusti∣no dicuntur, in quos nemo tam injustus fuit, ut ob hanc rem notam haeresos in illos confer∣ret.

Ex illis manifestum est Jansenii sensum duplici∣ter defendi posse. Primo ita ut quinque proposi∣tiones, & proprium earum sensum Jansenii esse quis fateatur, & eas nihilominus defendere non desistat. Hoc si quis fecerit, in illum insurgant Je∣suitae quantum volent.

Verum alia plane eximendi a noxa Jansenii ratio est: si quis videlicet ejus verba eo sensu interpre∣tetur, quem constat esse Catholicum; idemque pro∣positiones in earum proprio sensu damnet; at ipsas propositiones & proprium earum sensum in Janse∣nio se videre deneget. Qui ita se gerat, quocunque nomine afficiatur, haereticus dici nequit, cum sen∣sus ille, quem vere an falso Jansenii esse putat, ut Catholicus ab omnibus probetur.

Hoc constituto, reliquum est ut demonstrem hac tantum secunda ratione a permultis viris eruditis defendi Jansenium; quia nimirum ejus verba eo sensu accipiunt, quem nemo haereseos accusare au∣deat. Quod postquam confecero, sponte corruet Annatinum sophisma. Damnant enim Jansenii sensum Episcopi; sed illum videlicet, quem Jan∣senii esse crediderunt. Rursum quidam Jansenii sensum non ejurant; sed quia illum aliter quam Episcopi interpretantur, & eam tantum arbitrantur doctrinam in illo contineri, quam ipsis Episcopis, ipsi summo Pontifici, probatam esse certo sciunt. Non ergo illi ab Episcoporum mente & sententia discedunt in aliquo dogmate, sed tantum in intelli∣gentia Jansenii, quem illi durius, hi benignius in∣terpretantur. Vtrum in hoc sit temeritas aliqua, a∣lia est controversia; non esse haeresim, extra con∣troversiam est.

Omnis ergo difficultas ad hoc caput reducitur, u∣trum ille sensus, quem Jansenio tribuunt qui illum condemnare recusant, sit Catholicus, nec ab E∣piscopis damnatus dici possit. Hanc, ni fallor, prorsus eximet subjuncta sensus illius Janseniani explicatio, quem tuemur.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.