Variorum.
For method is not in one axiom, therefore here
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
For method is not in one axiom, therefore here
take heed that we be not deceived, taking that to break the rule of method, which is a breach of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉: as if this term invention be made a part of Rhe∣torick, it is against 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉: but if the doctrine of this rule Inventio est prima paus Dialecticae, &c. be taught in Rhetorick, that is a breach of method: con∣tra, the definition of Logick placed in Grammar or Rhetorick, is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, but a breach of method A∣gain, he saith they are various, not such as shall be contrary one to another, for the difference of the ax∣oms of Art is but in a diversity, as it were, not in op∣position, because in respect of the object they all tend to one thing.