Ejus modi syllogismus efficiture propositione copulata ne∣gata, quae negata complexio dicitur: quaeque dis∣junctionis affirmatae vim obtinet.
A syllogism whose proposition shall be a copulate axiom denied, because it is the same with a disjunct
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
A syllogism whose proposition shall be a copulate axiom denied, because it is the same with a disjunct
affirmed in value, ergo, it may make a disjunct syllo∣gism, this is seldom found in use, but because other Logicians teach it, ergo, our Author would not leave out any thing, that belongs to the Art of reason, as,
Non & dies est, & nox est; At dies est: Nonigitur nox est.Here non denies the one, and puts the other, for in a copulate axiom we heard, that non denied the cou∣pling of the parts, and this is called negata complexio, because here the proposition may be denied, where∣as before he said generally e propositione partibus om∣nibus affirmata.