The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.

About this Item

Title
The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published.
Author
Richardson, Alexander, of Queen's College, Cambridge.
Publication
London :: Printed by Gartrude Dawson, and are to be sold by Sam. Thomson at the White-Horse in Paul's Church-yard,
1657.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Logic
Ramus, Petrus, -- 1515-1572
Talon, Omer, -- ca. 1510-1562
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A91783.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The logicians school-master: or, A comment upon Ramus logick.: By Mr. Alexander Richardson, sometime of Queenes Colledge in Cambridge. Whereunto are added, his prelections on Ramus his grammer; Taleus his rhetorick; also his notes on physicks, ethicks, astronomy, medicine, and opticks. Never before published." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A91783.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 2, 2024.

Pages

Ʋt utramque partem antecedens, & assumptione affir∣matum intelligatur.

For that is understood, intelligatur, that is, even when it is contracted: so that here is the reason why this syllogism is first. Aristotle and all his sect that follow him make this figure last: but a syllogism is a disposition, and according to the disposition of the third argument, such is the syllogism, if therefore it go before in both the parts of the antecedent, why to go before is before to go behind, ergo, this must be the first. Kickerman saith Aristotles order is best, be∣cause the last figure is most general for use, he hath reason for it, for it is more large for his reach, but not so simple for disposition, and how can we conclude, till we know where to place the third argument.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.