therefore Aristotle doth define homo to be genus ra∣tionale, whereas we know genus is but an adjunct to animal, which is the genus of homo: so that it is not Art in the thing, but the knowledge he hath of it, which is adjoyned to man. Now we have heard, that Art is the wisdom of God, in ente a primo, and the frame of the creature is in the antitype of this wisdom, and is a subject of Art. I say, Ars est quae constat, though it be the frame of the thing. Now con∣stare is to stand together in parts.
Quest. How come Arts to have parts, being but that one wisdom in God?
Answ. Not in regard of God, but in respect of the frame of the thing where we see it. For even as Gods Mercy and Justice are one, but various in re∣spect of the object: It is Mercy to him that comes before him in Christ; It is Justice to him that ap∣peares before him without Christ: So Art is one in God, but is various in respect of the various work it hath wrought in the creation of things, and that it acteth in their government to their end. Again, those parts must constare, for in the frame of the thing the subjects of the Arts do constare, ergo this wisdom fol∣lowing them must constare in his parts: and as one thing hath his frame, and another his, differing from the other; hence the precepts of Arts must be vari∣ous, and must constare one with another; hence it follows, that in Art we must have no rules but those that will constare, and are essential to it. So that if we bring a rule of Grammar into Logick, or econtra: or if we leave out of Logick some essential rule to it, it will not constare: again, if the rules of Art be dis∣ordered, they will not stand together: therefore when I say constare, I say two things, first that every