And if ever they gain the Government, an Universal Liberty must still continue: for no comprehension, nor any imaginable contrivance, can unite, and bring more than one Party to the same Rule; nor that one neither, un∣less that Rule be of its own making: and consequently Establish any one way, what you will, and all the rest fly off, and conspire the breaking those Methods. Nor can any one Party oblige all the rest; because the rest in con∣junction will ever be too strong for one. And yet to Establish a Tolleration by Universal consent is impossible too; for the Presbyterians, when uppermost, declared against this, as much as ever they did against Popery it self. There∣fore take which part you will, a Tolleration, or no Tolleration; and all the Fat is in the fire, either on this hand or that. In fine then this must be such a Liberty, which the People took, when there was no King in Israel; every one doing what seem'd good in his own eyes.
By which means every Party becomes a Body distinct of it self, and we have as many Scisms, and Separations, and Interests, as Parties: whence every one is against every one: and whilst they are all endeavouring to promote every Man his Way, and Party above the rest; they do hinder, and pull back one another, till they all fall together by the ears. Therefore such Popular Associ∣ations, have War, Liberty, and Confusion, their inseparable adjuncts. Which things do give the greatest advantage to Popery.
For which cause Oats tells you the Jesuits were stirring up the Scots against the Bishops, and in defence of their Covenant: and the spring following they did rise, and declare accordingly: and Fitz-Harys, who was an Irish Papist, made a disturbance the very design of that Libel, for which he suffered.
Nor doth the same Oats say any less of a Tolleration; but speaks it a great ad∣vance to the Popish Interest. And Coleman in his long Letter, saith, that the next Session of Parliament, They, viz. the Papists design'd the procuring a Liberty of Conscience; which, saith he, if we gain, will be half our point. In which last are many Authorities: for he was a Man, that understood the sense of that Party, as much as any; and consequently we have herein not his pri∣vate Sentiments only, but the Judgment of the Jesuits, who were ever ac∣knowledged well seen in Politicks. And truly they had both Reason, and Ob∣servation, to support this confidence.
1. Reason pleads that an Universal Toleration must be much more advan∣tagious to the Papists, than to Dissenters; because the Papists are kept clear, and firm to their Principles, and lie in no danger of receiving any thing con∣trary to the Doctrine of their Church: but Dissenters, being kept to no Rule, run into all extravagancy, and receive any wild conceptions, that are suggested to them: therefore while Dissenters are multiplying Opinions, changing, and opposing Parties; the Papists are gathering Proselytes from amongst them all. Therefore if such Toleration be advantageous to Dissenters, which yet they pre∣sume; and therefore received it so joyfully, that Wild returns a Ballad of Thanks, and his Wise was so transported, she leaves her Gridiron, and runs with an Herring tail hanging out at her mouth to hear the news; it must needs be much more advantageous to the Romanists: and therefore considera∣bly so.
But suppose such Liberty Exclude the Papists, yet it matters not much. For these creep into every Party, and under disguises of Mechanicks, and gifted Men, will have Liberty of maintaining old, and inventing what new Opi∣nions they please.
Among which they promote especially.
1. Such as set every Party against every one; and incline them, as much as may be, to the destroying one another.
2. Such, that dispose Men for the receiving the Romish Faith: in which the Jesuit hath went very far already: as in Doctrines of Resistance, Infallibility,