Sect. 25.
Having made this way for his own unhappi∣nesse,* 1.1 by that variety of attempts to which Mr. Hick. (it seems) betray'd him; he acts the well-natur'd man, and even blesseth the Author of his unhappinesse.
He de∣clares that Mr. Hick. is his cordial friend, who wrote well to him, told him learnedly and wittily, that Mr. T. P. is the first who gave sin this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, an extraordinary invention, p. 114.] Here is his tragical Exit for many rea∣sons. 1. Mr. Hick.'s saying that my invention is extraor∣dinary, is no proof that Arminius doth say the contrary, or that Mr. Hick. did write well, or that his saying was both learned and witty. Each of these I deny, and have sufficiently disproved in my eighteenth Section. 2. He knowes that I had never mentioned any such Heathenish expression, as sins 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉; nor was it ever to be found in any Author but Mr. Hick. And he knowes that it was clearly his own invention; either arising from his opinion that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was derived from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 pono, and signified the posicive entity of sin, (which though a sad miscarriage of the Scholar, is yet the very best that his friends can make of it) or from his sadder apprehension that sin must needs have a Godhead, if it is none of God's creatures, and yet a positive thing. To believe the former were a huge act of charity; but there is no place for it with Mr. Hick. who hath forced me to the severity of belie∣ving the later. 3. All Mr. Hick. hath displayed is his being overflown with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, which (could its