Page 515
DANIEL:
The Preface:
THE prophesie of Daniel, hath beene much impugned of old, and stiffly denyed by many to be Canonicall Scrip∣ture. 1. By Porphyrie the Disciple of Plotinus, who said, that this Book was not written by the Prophet Daniel, but by some other man in his name, & that not till the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, that persecuting tyrant, who reigned over Syria, & compelled many by punishments to forsake the Law of God. Then saith he, was this Book written, not by any Propheticall spirit, but under a pre∣tence of prophesying relating things done, in the time of the aforesaid Antio∣chus. And he saith further, that the Histories here written in the former 6 chap∣ters were true, but from thence forth that which is written by way of pro∣phesying came from a false and lying spirit. Thus that railer against the Christian religion, who wrote 15 Bookes against Christianity, and in the 12 Book thus against this Prophecy of Daniel. But that not Daniel, but hee was a notorious lyar, appeareth from the time, when hee saith, that this book was written, viz. in the dayes of Antiochus Epiphanes. For Josephus saith, * 1.1 that the Prophecy of Daniel was shewed to Alexander the Great, and therein that vision of the Goat, chap. 8. 5. representing him in his swift and speedy subduing of all Kingdomes and Nations, and betwixt Alexander and Antio∣chus Epiphanes were 140 years. Against this Porphyrius wrote Theodoret and Je∣rome relating these things touching him. 2. Celsus also impugned this book, * 1.2 as not being Canonicall Scripture, against whom Origen wrote 8 Bookes. 3. Many Rabbins of the Jews have rejected it likewise as not Canonicall, as Polanus saith, that he living sometime in Moravia, where he used the help of * 1.3 some Rabbins for the understanding of the Hebrew tongue, heard them say, that they acknowledged not Daniel to be authenticall, and therefore seldome read it, especially because that chap. 9. the death and passion of the Messiah, and the time when, is so evidently forth. Therefore they read it not amongst the people, lest hereby they should be turned to Christ, finding out how they had been by them deceived. But the antienter Rabbins generally have ac∣knowledged Daniel to be Canonicall Scripture, as appeareth in their placing it in their Banobathca in Pereh Primo amongst their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as Polanus saith. And therefore some of them have written Commentaries hereupon, as Rabbi Solomon, Rabbi Levi, Ben. David, Rabbi Abraham, &c. and some have alleadged Daniel as authenticall to confirm points of Faith, as Rab. Moses Hadarsian Ben. Jieskaki in suo Perus. super Gen. R. Abba fil. Cahena.