For full access to this item, please  Login

Add to bookbag
Author: Dury, John, 1596-1680.
Title: Objections against the taking of the engagement answered. Or, Some scruples of conscience, which a godly minister in Lancashire did entertain against the taking of the engagement. Resolved by J.D. wherein the chief mistakes of weak consciences, about the matter of the engagement, are in a friendly way discovered, and rectified by scripture-grounds and right reason; and published for the satisfaction of others, who may be scrupled in the same kind.
Publication info: Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) :: Text Creation Partnership,
2013-12 (EEBO-TCP Phase 2).
Rights/Permissions:

This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. Searching, reading, printing, or downloading EEBO-TCP texts is reserved for the authorized users of these project partner institutions. Permission must be granted for subsequent distribution, in print or electronically, of this text, in whole or in part. Please contact project staff at eebotcp-info@umich.edu for further information or permissions.

Print source: Objections against the taking of the engagement answered. Or, Some scruples of conscience, which a godly minister in Lancashire did entertain against the taking of the engagement. Resolved by J.D. wherein the chief mistakes of weak consciences, about the matter of the engagement, are in a friendly way discovered, and rectified by scripture-grounds and right reason; and published for the satisfaction of others, who may be scrupled in the same kind.
Dury, John, 1596-1680.

London: Printed by John Clowes, for Richard Woodnothe at the Star under St. Peters Church in Cornhill, 1650.
Subject terms:
England and Wales. -- Act for subscribing the Engagement.
Great Britain -- History -- Commonwealth and Protectorate, 1649-1660 -- Early works to 1800.
URL: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A81926.0001.001

Contents
title page
letter
OBJECTIONS against the taking of the ENGAGEMENT Answered.