The Catholick doctrine of transubtantiation proued to be ancient and orthodoxall against the sclanderous tongue of D. Iohn Cozens a Protestants minister auouching the sayd doctrine neuer to haue been knowne, in the Church before the Councels of Latteran and of Trent.

About this Item

Title
The Catholick doctrine of transubtantiation proued to be ancient and orthodoxall against the sclanderous tongue of D. Iohn Cozens a Protestants minister auouching the sayd doctrine neuer to haue been knowne, in the Church before the Councels of Latteran and of Trent.
Author
Campion, William, 1599-1665.
Publication
Printed at Paris. :: [s.n.],
M. DC. LVII [1657]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Cosin, John, 1594-1672. -- Historia transubstantiationis papalis.
Transubstantiation.
Lord's Supper -- Real presence.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A79660.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The Catholick doctrine of transubtantiation proued to be ancient and orthodoxall against the sclanderous tongue of D. Iohn Cozens a Protestants minister auouching the sayd doctrine neuer to haue been knowne, in the Church before the Councels of Latteran and of Trent." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A79660.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

§. 37. S. Ambrose de myster. init. cap. 9.

HOW many examples do we vse to proue that the thing is not that which nature made, but that which the bles∣sing hath consecrated; and that the power of Consecra∣tion is greater then the power of nature: for by Consecra∣tion the wery nature it selfe is changed. Thou hast lear∣ned therefore that of bread is made the body of Christ, and that wine & water is put into the

Page 66

Chalice, but by the Consecra∣tion of the heauenly word it is made bloud. And hauing alleadged many examples, as of Moyses his rod change in∣to à serpent, water into wine he goes on saying. Now if hu∣man benediction preuailed so farre as to Change & conuert nature, what say we of the di∣uine Consecration, where the very words of our Sauiour are operatiue & do worke? for this Sacrament, which thou recei∣uest, is made by the word of Christ. If the word of Elias preuailed so farre, as to bring downe fy∣re from heauen; shall not the word of Christ preuaile so farre as to Change the species or na∣ture of the Elements? Of the workes of the whole word thou hast read, that he sayd the

Page 67

word and they were made; he commanded, and they were created: the word of Christ then which was able to make of nothing that which was not, cannot he change the things that haue being into that which they were not? it is not a lesse matter to giue new natures, then to change them. Thus S. Ambrose: by all which it is cleere that he speakes not heere of an acci∣dentall Morall change in vse and office, not of an externall deputation of the bread and wine (corporall foode) to si∣gnify spirituall nourishment; butt of a Physicall change; of a change in nature, of such a change as none but omnipo∣tent power of the Creator can make in his Creatures.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.