SECT. LXIX.
BUT Mr. Pierce thinks [it had been * 1.1 well if I had named those Papists, and then have publikely declared that I meant no more: p. 94.] I am not of that mind.
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
BUT Mr. Pierce thinks [it had been * 1.1 well if I had named those Papists, and then have publikely declared that I meant no more: p. 94.] I am not of that mind.
For 1. Some of them have very lovingly sought to proselyte me, as having (by the reproaches of some unadvised Brethren) been brought to have some hopes of me; And truly ingenuity prohibits me to be∣tray them that manifested their love to me, though in a mistaken way: For I am confident, they think they are in the right, and intended my good while they endea∣voured my hurt. 2. What if I had named Bishop Goodman, and all the rabble that your Friend in the Legenda Lignea de∣scribes (which are more then Dr. Vane, and Dr. Goffe and Dr. Baily, and H. P. de Cressy, as you may there see,) had it been reasonable that I should have thought there are no more? 3. Grotius assures me himself (whom I have reason to believe) that not a few such there were among the Prelatical men: And what if I knew not the name of one of them, should I not therefore take any notice that such there are? 4. By this time I suppose both you and all men see that the Papists are crept in among all Sects, especially the Quakers, and Seekers, whom they animate, and al∣so among the Anabaptists, Millenaries, Levellers, yea and the Independents, and if this weeks Diurnal say true, one was
taken that was a pretended friend to the Presbyterians. Must I needs name all these, or else say nothing of them? Or are you able to name all the Papists, the Fryars and Je∣suites your selves that are now under the Vizor of any of these Sects, playing their parts in England? you would take it to be an unreasonable motion: when yet you know, or have reason to believe that at this day there are hundreds of them here at work.
§. 69.