The Grotian religion discovered, at the invitation of Mr. Thomas Pierce in his Vindication. With a preface, vindicating the Synod of Dort from the calumnies of the new Tilenus; and David, Peter, &c. And the Puritanes, and sequestrations, &c. from the censures of Mr. Pierce. / By Richard Baxter, Catholick.

About this Item

Title
The Grotian religion discovered, at the invitation of Mr. Thomas Pierce in his Vindication. With a preface, vindicating the Synod of Dort from the calumnies of the new Tilenus; and David, Peter, &c. And the Puritanes, and sequestrations, &c. from the censures of Mr. Pierce. / By Richard Baxter, Catholick.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London, :: Printed by R.W. for Nevill Simmons bookseller in Kederminster, and are to be sold by him there, and by Tho. Brewster at the three Bibles, and by John Starkey at the Miter at the west end of Pauls.,
1658.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A76177.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The Grotian religion discovered, at the invitation of Mr. Thomas Pierce in his Vindication. With a preface, vindicating the Synod of Dort from the calumnies of the new Tilenus; and David, Peter, &c. And the Puritanes, and sequestrations, &c. from the censures of Mr. Pierce. / By Richard Baxter, Catholick." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A76177.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Page 11

SECT. V.

THE things then that I dissallow in * 1.1 Grotius his design and doctrines, are these. 1. That he was not truly Catholick in those designs and doctrines. So far am I from condemning him for extending his charity & Healing attempts as far as to the Papists, that my greatest dislike is that he extended them no further. He begun his Pacificato∣ry attempts with the Protestants only, for the uniting of the Arminians and Calvinists (see his notable Oration in Senatu Amstelo∣damensi.) Afterwards he thought this too narrow a design, and unanswerable to his later principles, and so turning Papist, ima∣gined that Rome must be the Head of the Unity, or else it could not be expected. But by this means he dropt into a deplorable Schism, excluding all the Affrican, Asian and European Churches that cannot submit to the Roman Head, and to many of those Do∣ctrines which Grotius now at last doth pa∣tronize. Saith Bishop Bromhal to Mileterius (p. 51.) [If you seek to obtrude upon him the Roman Church with its adherents for the Ca∣tholick Church, excluding three parts of four of the Christian world from the Communion of

Page 14

Christ, or the opinions thereof for Articles and Fundamentals of Catholick Faith, nei∣ther his Reason, nor his Religion, nor his Charity will suffer him to listen to you.] Was this Catholicism, ro set up a Head or Center of Union, with other termes of Union and Peace which three parts of four of the (al∣ready) Catholick Church do dissent from? What may be called Schism if this be a Catholick design? This is my first dislike.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.