SECT. I.
IN a Book called Christian * 1.1 Concord, having to do with some that will have no Peace, but by the de∣grading of all the Prote∣stant Ministers, and un∣churching all the Protestant Churches that are not Prelatical, I thought it my duty to
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
IN a Book called Christian * 1.1 Concord, having to do with some that will have no Peace, but by the de∣grading of all the Prote∣stant Ministers, and un∣churching all the Protestant Churches that are not Prelatical, I thought it my duty to
warn those that are in danger of the design of such as under the name of Episcopal Di∣vines, do prosecute the design of Cassander and Grotius, to reconcile us to the Pope, upon certain abatements and Reformations of the Romanists. Hereupon I find the Learned and Reverend Dr. Sanderson take notice of it in his Preface to his Sermons, as if it tended too much to raise a jealousie of Episcopal Divines; and the same offence is fullier expressed by the Reverend Mr. Tho. Pierce in his Rejoynder to Mr. Barlee. But these Reverend persons should have noted, that I purposely protested against any accusation of the Episcopal in general, and as such, or any of them, except the guilty, whom I there in part described, which was fitter then the nomination which Mr. Pierce would have. And by name I profess my very great reverence to Dr. Sanderson and such as he.
But Mr. Pierce wonders how I was be∣trayed to speak so severely of so excellent a person as Grotius, unless by taking things on trust; and therefore he makes it part of the Title of his Book, to be [A Vindication of Grotius from Mr. Baxter.] I took him to be a Cassandrian Papist; and Mr. Pierce and many more among us that vindicate
him do take this to be an injurious imputa∣tion. I am here in a great strait! For now if I prove Grotius a Papist, I fear much lest I shall offend his Learned followers and vindicators, as if withal I proved them al∣so to be Papists; which is none of my de∣sign; nor would I so be understood unless they follow him in the very points that I charge him with. And if I say nothing, I shall be unjust to my self to my self, in lying under the injurious charge of being a false accuser of so great a man But Truth is Truth; and I hope will do less harm then silence, when I have so loud a call to speak. Forbearing therefore the search of Mr. Pierces words concerning me, be∣cause I would not trouble my self, or him, or the Reader with unneceslary altercati∣ons, I shall only give him a plain account of my Reasons for such thoughts and words of Grotius (and consequently of all that are therein of his mind,) as he takes offence at; and let him see that I use not to charge men so deeply upon the trust of any ac∣cusers words.
And here 1. I shall te••l him how far it is that I blame Grotius and dislike his design, and how far I approve it, and ho∣nor the man. 2. And then when I have
opened the reasons of my offence, I shall produce my evidence to prove that Groti∣us was a Papist as far and as deeply guilty as I charged him to be.
§. 1.