A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.

About this Item

Title
A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for Nevil Simons and Jonath. Robinson ...,
1676.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 2, 2024.

Pages

Reply.

To your Argument I answer:

1. The Text may argue, not à ratione objectivâ; but à ratione efficiente; q. d. Because he first loved us, therefore hath he prevented us by his Grace, and given us hearts to love him again.

2. If you were sure it argued à ratione objectivà, yet you endeavour to prove no more, but that the assenting act of Faith goes before love; which I af∣firm as much as you, while I say, it goes before Con∣sent, Acceptance, Election.

3. Your Argument, as you urge it, tends to prove that Love, even in time follows Faith: Yet you never yet denied that Acceptance and Election is a justifying act: And can you think, that Ac∣ceptatio

Page 197

vel Electio boni, hath no love in it, but is wholly antecedent? or that the Apostles 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, embracing, Heb. 11. 13. which you cited, containeth no love in it? Your Friend and mine Mr. Leigh thought it did. See what he citeth, Crit. Sacr. out of Davenant, and Beza, and Paraeus, Est amanter amplecti, & salutare & osculari.

4. The first orderly love to God in the Soul ariseth not from our belief or assurance, that he loves us in particular more than others of the World, but from the apprehension of his natural excellency, good∣ness, and common love to mankind in giving Christ for them, and in him offering to be freely reconciled to them, and tendring Christ, and Pardon, and Sal∣vation to them; upon the belief of which, they lovingly accept Christ offered, which is the compleat act of justifying Faith, being the Marriage between Christ and the Soul. And so as you may say, the compleat act of Faith, is a fruit of the incompleat act: So you may say, that this love is a fruit of this belief.

5. And I need not again tell you, that I neither speak of any other love here, but love to the accepted Redeemer, or Head and Husband Christ (whom we do not accept or marry first, and only after love him, but do lovingly accept) nor of the following acts of love in our lives, which may be called the fruits of our first loving acceptance. Chamier. Panstrat. de Fide, l. 12. c. 4. (mihi) p. 375. Omnis amor est actus volun∣tatis: At fides est amor: ergo, &c. minor probatur. Vera fides est ea quae credit in Deum: At credere in Deum est amare Deum, &c.

6. Aquinas, and others ordinarily say, That Love, as it is in the rational part, is nothing but Velle, 1, 2. q. 22. a. 3. 3. & 1. q. 20. a. 1. so Zanchius very

Page 198

oft. So Tolet. de Anima. in l. 3. c. 9. q. 27, 28. Circa bonum prima passio est amor. Amor est omnium pri∣ma & ipsarum parens, &c. Amor est, 1. Concu∣piscentiae. 2. Benevolentiae vel amicitiae. Ille est velle bonum ad se ordinando, &c. Alter est velle bonum propter seipsum, &c. Vid. ultra. So Gerson part. 4. fol. 27. de Passionibus animae, Ames. contr. Grevin∣chov. pag. 16. Abundance more I could cite, speci∣ally Philosophers, to the same purpose, but that I will not so trouble you and my self in vain. Now certainly Acceptance is velle bonum; and certainly before velle there is no act of the Will to good.

7. I deny not amare Deum to be an effect, in the sense oft explained already.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.