A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.

About this Item

Title
A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for Nevil Simons and Jonath. Robinson ...,
1676.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2024.

Pages

Aphorism.

BƲt grant that all God's immanent * 1.1 Acts are eternal (which I think is quite beyond our understanding to know,) &c.

Page 158

Animadvers.

Immanent acts (as that very word it self doth shew) abiding in the agent (for therefore they are called immanent.) Li∣ther God's immann Acts must be eternal, or there must be somehing in God which is but temporal: Whereas quicquid est in De est Deus: othewise he should not be a most pure and simple Essence, as he is.

Reply.

I use to speak as you do; and thus oppose those that think otherwise: But let me profess, it is but my Opinion, and not my Faith. I have no such clear knowledg of the Divine Essence, as per∣emptorily to conclude these things as certain. I know God is eternal, and that he is perfect: But whether his perfection lye, in having no Acts but his Essence; or whether God do agere at all; or whether his Acts have extrinsick objects; or whe∣ther those Acts which have such extrinsick ob∣jects, are properly immanent, as those are whose object is God himself, &c. I dare not conclude as certain, though I think as you. Oh how little know I of God's Essence!

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.