A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.

About this Item

Title
A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter.
Author
Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.
Publication
London :: Printed for Nevil Simons and Jonath. Robinson ...,
1676.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A treatise of justifying righteousness in two books ... : all published instead of a fuller answer to the assaults in Dr. Tullies Justificatio Paulina ... / by Richard Baxter." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69541.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2024.

Pages

Aphorism.

NOw they are only Afflictions of love, and not punishments.

Animadvers.

They are not so contradistinct, but that they may be co-inci∣dent. Some punishments may be afflictions of love; viz. Such as are for the correcting, purging, and reforming of the party punished. Castigatory punishments are Afflictions of love; Whom I love, I rebuke and chasten, Rev. 3. 19. Whom the Lord loveth, he chasteneth, Heb. 12. 6. Some indeed (not only Antinomians, but others also) seem to make Chastise∣ments no judgments or punishments; but the Scripture is clear against them; When we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, &c. 1 Cor. 11. 32. I will correct thee in measure, yet will I not leave thee wholly unpunished, Jer. 46. 28.

Reply.

1. You are a favourable Animadverter, who so ordinarily take my part, and defend what I say, under the name of Animadversion. You say as much as I; and in these words have fully expressed the sum of my sense. Only once or twice I care∣lesly, in compliance with the common Language, use the term [Affliction,] for [Chastisement;] which is all the occasion of exception that I yet see.

Page 46

2. But it was a great oversight in you, to impute the alledged opinion or words of those that I op∣pose, to me, as if they were mine. These are my words, [The common judgment is, That Christ hath taken away the whole Curse (though not the suffer∣ing) by hearing it himself; and now they are only af∣flictions of love, and not punishments. I do not con∣tradict this Doctrine through affectation of singularity, but constraint of judgment, &c.] Had it not been ve∣ry easie to know that those are not my words or opinion, which I so professedly oppose? The same which you say some, [not Antinomians] hold, I called [the common judgment:] For indeed Peter Mar∣tyr, Zanchius, and multitudes of others against the Papists, besides late English Writers, commonly say so. But yet we have very many accurate Di∣vines that say as much as I, and contradict them, as you do: And sometimes they contradict them∣selves. My full scope therefore is to prove, that Chastisements are a species of Punishment.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.