R. ABBOT.
You haue shewed your owne folly M. Bishop, and dis∣honestly,
The third part of the Defence of the Reformed Catholike against Doct. Bishops Second part of the Reformation of a Catholike, as the same was first guilefully published vnder that name, conteining only a large and most malicious preface to the reader, and an answer to M. Perkins his aduertisement to Romane Catholicks, &c. Whereunto is added an aduertisement for the time concerning the said Doct. Bishops reproofe, lately published against a little piece of the answer to his epistle to the King, with an answer to some few exceptions taken against the same, by M. T. Higgons latley become a proselyte of the Church of Rome. By R. Abbot Doctor of Diuinitie.
About this Item
- Title
- The third part of the Defence of the Reformed Catholike against Doct. Bishops Second part of the Reformation of a Catholike, as the same was first guilefully published vnder that name, conteining only a large and most malicious preface to the reader, and an answer to M. Perkins his aduertisement to Romane Catholicks, &c. Whereunto is added an aduertisement for the time concerning the said Doct. Bishops reproofe, lately published against a little piece of the answer to his epistle to the King, with an answer to some few exceptions taken against the same, by M. T. Higgons latley become a proselyte of the Church of Rome. By R. Abbot Doctor of Diuinitie.
- Author
- Abbot, Robert, 1560-1618.
- Publication
- Londini :: Impensis Georgii Bishop,
- 1609.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Bishop, William, 1554?-1624. -- Second part of The reformation of a Catholike deformed -- Early works to 1800.
- Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69095.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"The third part of the Defence of the Reformed Catholike against Doct. Bishops Second part of the Reformation of a Catholike, as the same was first guilefully published vnder that name, conteining only a large and most malicious preface to the reader, and an answer to M. Perkins his aduertisement to Romane Catholicks, &c. Whereunto is added an aduertisement for the time concerning the said Doct. Bishops reproofe, lately published against a little piece of the answer to his epistle to the King, with an answer to some few exceptions taken against the same, by M. T. Higgons latley become a proselyte of the Church of Rome. By R. Abbot Doctor of Diuinitie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online 2. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A69095.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.
Pages
Page 311
* 1.1 but for the peruerting of any articles of faith on our side, you haue shewed nothing. We teach faith, hope, and charitie as God hath taught them, not as your schoole hath newly framed them. We teach faith wherby a 1.2 to be∣leeue the record that God witnesseth of his Sonne, that God hath giuen vnto vs eternall life, and this life is in his Sonne. We teach hope whereby b 1.3 to wait with patience for the reueil∣ling of that which God hath giuen vs. Wee teach charitie, whereby to performe c 1.4 those good works which God hath prepared for vs, as the way wherein to walke to the receiuing of it. True, reall and externall sacrifice for propitiation of sin we teach none but the sacrifice of the passion of Christ, because by d 1.5 being once offered, he hath taken away our sinnes, and made perfect for euer them that are sanctified. Therefore the sacrifice which he intendeth, is no other but sacriledge and idolatrie, and because God hath condemned it, there∣fore are we iustly at defiance with it. I may not omit how he heere bobbeth his Reader with, as in that question hath beene prooued, whereas of that question hee hath said iust neuer a word.
Notes
-
* 1.1
The Prote∣stants teach faith, hope and charitie aright.
-
a 1.2
1. Io. 5.10.11.
-
b 1.3
Rom. 8.25.
-
c 1.4
Eph. 2.10.
-
d 1.5
Heb. 9.28. & 10.14.