Philip Holman against Tuke.
PHillip Holman was executor of George Holman, and he brought an action of debt against George Tuke, and declared upon a lease made by himself by the name of Philip Holman executor of the Testament of George Holman deceased of such land, and the said land was delivered to him in execution of a Statute by ex∣tent, which Statute was made to this Testator, and this lease was for years, if the Plantiff should so long continue seised by force of the Statute, and it was ren∣dring 100. l. per annum and for 3. years rent behinde, he brought his action in the debet and in the detinet, and also in the declaration he averred, that he did continue seised so long by vertue of the extent, and Serjeant Bing demurred in law, because he said the action ought to be brought in the detinet only; because he had brought the action as executor; but Hendon and the Court &c. Iones and Hutton to the contrary, because the lease was made by himself, and Hutton said in the case there is difference between a personal contract, and real, and it was said, that an executor shall never be forced to bring his action in the detinet only, where he need not name himself to be an executor: which note well.
It was agreed in a case by Hobert, that where a man brought an action de parco facto and declared upon the breach of a pound, and also of the taking out of beasts; and the Defendant as to the taking out of the beasts, pleaded not guilty, and as to the breaking of the pound, he said that he was Lord of the Soil, upon which the pound stood, and tha•• he brake of the Lock, and put a lock of his own;