Tomkins against Jourden.
Mich. 24 Car. Banc. Reg.
Trin. 24 Car. rot. 96.
A Writ of Error was brought to reverse a Iudgment given in an inferi∣our Court, & these Errors we are assigned.* 1.1 1. It is said in the stile of the Court that the Court was held per consuetudinem et literas patences, which is not good, for the Court cannot be held by both. Roll Iustice, This is not good, 2ly. Against the writ of Error it is objected by the other side, that the writ of Error is directed to one, and is retorned by another, for the certiorari was to certyfie a Iudgement given before the Maior, Aldermen, and Recorder, and the Iudgement certifyed, is a Iudgement given before the Maior and the Aldermen, and the Recorder is left out, so that the Record is not re∣moved, and then the Iudgement cannot be affirmed. Roll Iustice said, the pleading is confused, and Bacon Iustice said, you have changed the stile of the corporation by your pleading; If a Court be held by Custom,* 1.2 and after a patent be purchased to hold it, and they hold it by the patent, the Custom is gone; but bring us a Copy of the certificate of the stile of the Court, and in the mean time we will advise.