Let the Parts be a and b, then will the whole be 〈 math 〉〈 math 〉
Which if you multiply by it self 〈 math 〉〈 math 〉
You have the Square 〈 math 〉〈 math 〉
(See Fig. 51. N. 1.) Q.E.D.
CONSECTARYS.
I. HEnce you have the Original Rule for Extracting of Square Roots, as we have shewn after Definition 30. and here have further Illustrated in Scheme No 2.
II. Hence it naturally follows, that the Square of double any Side is Quadruple of the Square of that Side taken singly.
III. Hence also you have the addition of surd Numbers, or in general of surd Quantities, by help of the following Rule (supposing in the mean while their Multiplication:) Suppose these 2 Surds √8 and √18, or more generally √75aa and √27aa, are to be added together; first add their Squares 8 and 18, &c. then double their Rectangle (√144) that is, multiply it by the √4, and then the double of this √576, i. e. having ex∣tracted the Square Root, (24) and added it to the Sum of the first Squares (26) the Root of the whole Summ (50) viz. √50, is the Sum of the two surd Quantities first proposed.
SCHOLIUM.
BUT if it happens that the Root of the double Product can∣not be expressed by a Rational Number (as, when the proposed Quantities are Surds, as √3 and √7, to whose Squares 3+7, i. e. 10, you must add the double Product of √7 by √3, i. e. √84, which cannot be expressed by a Rational Num∣ber) then that double Product must be joined under a Surd Form, or Radical Sign, to the Sum of the Squares (thus, viz. 10+√84) and to this whole Aggregate prefix another Radi∣cal Sign, thus, 〈 math 〉〈 math 〉; or also you may only simply join the Surd Quantities proposed by the Sign + thus, √3+√7. Here also you may note, that the two Surd Quantities proposed